The foundation the platform runs on — software-defined, hyper-converged storage on commodity hardware — the way providers OWN their backup economics instead of renting the meter.
How it’s rated
Full scoreboard ↓Quick answer
Acronis Cyber Infrastructure is the foundation the platform runs on — and the margin lever MSPs quietly love: multi-tenant, hyper-converged, software-defined storage and compute that serves as a cost-efficient backup-storage and disaster-recovery target. Instead of renting all their storage from a public cloud (where the meter runs forever), providers deploy Cyber Infrastructure on commodity hardware to OWN their backup storage economics — the same scale-out, redundant, cyber-hardened platform that runs Acronis's own cloud, available to run yours. It stores backup data, runs DR workloads, and increasingly handles edge and virtualization workloads too. For providers at scale, moving storage from a rented line to owned infrastructure is where the platform's ROI concentrates.
This page covers Cyber Infrastructure. The rest of the platform:
Most product pages skip this. We start here — so you buy a capability, not a buzzword.
Storage (and compute) intelligence in software on commodity hardware — scale-out, redundant, multi-tenant — serving as a cost-efficient backup-storage and DR target.
It’s the foundation Acronis’s platform writes to, available for providers to own instead of rent.
What consolidation actually replaces, dimension by dimension.
| Dimension | Rented cloud + appliance tax | Owned SDS/HCI (Acronis) |
|---|---|---|
| Storage economics | Rented cloud meter, forever | Owned commodity infrastructure |
| Hardware | Proprietary appliance tax | Standard servers, add nodes |
| The backup target | A third-party bolt-on | Native to Cyber Protect Cloud |
| DR compute | A separate DR site | Hyper-converged with storage |
| Margin | Leaks to the hyperscaler | Kept on owned infrastructure |
| Residency | Cloud-region caveats | Your hardware, your location |
| Scaling | Buy a bigger appliance | Add a commodity node |
| Virtualization | A separate VMware bill | Cyber Frame on the same platform |
It's an infrastructure project — deploy properly, then the owned economics compound with every terabyte.
Vendors love diagrams; buyers need to know what they’re actually operating. Here’s the whole platform, demystified.
Redundant, scale-out storage on standard servers — capacity grows by adding nodes, not buying proprietary appliances.
Isolated storage per client tenant — the provider serves many customers from owned infrastructure with clean separation.
Compute alongside storage — run DR workloads, edge workloads and (via Cyber Frame) virtualization on the same platform.
Immutability, encryption and the security posture the 'Cyber' name implies — storage that resists the attacks it protects against.
The native backup-storage and DR target for Cyber Protect Cloud — the foundation the whole platform writes to.
One agent on every machine, one console over all of them — modules attach without a second operational world.
Acronis turns rented backup-storage economics into owned margin — on the platform it runs its own cloud on.
Scale-out redundant storage on commodity servers — capacity grows by adding nodes, no appliance tax.
The storage Cyber Protect Cloud writes to natively — foundation, not bolt-on.
Isolated storage per tenant — the provider serves many clients from owned infrastructure.
S3-compatible object plus block storage — the formats backup and workloads need.
The security posture the 'Cyber' name implies — immutability and encryption built in.
Compute alongside storage — the same nodes run workloads, not just store data.
DR workloads spin up on the same infrastructure that stores the backups — target and compute unified.
Efficient at the edge — protection and compute where the data is generated.
The newer virtualization direction — the VMware-alternative space, on the same platform.
Standard servers, not proprietary boxes — the hardware markup that inflates storage, gone.
Turn the rented cloud meter into owned capacity — the margin lever for providers at scale.
The same infrastructure Acronis runs its own cloud on — battle-tested at 750K businesses.
The introduction, the backup-target setup and the Cyber Frame direction.
The software-defined storage foundation explained.
Configuring it as the backup target — the core use case.
The newer virtualization direction on the infrastructure.
Want a live, India-context walkthrough on your own fleet?
Book a guided demo →Here’s what genuinely sets Cyber Infrastructure apart from the alternatives.
For an MSP renting all its backup storage from a public cloud, the meter runs forever and the margin leaks. Cyber Infrastructure on commodity hardware turns that rented line into owned capacity — frequently where the whole platform's ROI concentrates.
Software-defined on standard servers — capacity grows by adding commodity nodes, not by buying the vendor's overpriced appliances. The hardware markup that inflates traditional storage, gone.
It's the native backup-storage and DR target for Cyber Protect Cloud — not a bolt-on but the foundation the whole platform is designed to write to. Storage and protection from one vendor, one architecture.
Hyper-converged means compute alongside storage — so DR workloads spin up on the same infrastructure that stores the backups. The DR target and the DR compute, unified.
This is the infrastructure behind Acronis's own cloud — battle-tested at the scale of 750,000 protected businesses, available for providers to run themselves. The pedigree is the product being dogfooded.
With Cyber Frame (the newer virtualization direction), the infrastructure is growing beyond storage into the VMware-alternative space MSPs are actively shopping for — one platform, more of the stack.
Current backup-storage spend (the rented meter), TB volume and growth, and the residency picture — TechBag models the owned-vs-rented case free.
Commodity nodes provisioned, the software-defined storage cluster stood up, multi-tenancy configured — an infrastructure project, done properly.
Cyber Protect Cloud writing to it natively; a DR workload spun up on the HCI; the economics validated.
Backup storage on owned infrastructure, margin kept, scaling by adding nodes. TechBag manages capacity licensing.
Trusted across regulated industries in 100+ countries
Modelled on Gartner Peer Insights structure. *Counts and breakdowns are illustrative pending verified review collection.
“We were renting all our backup storage from a hyperscaler — the meter was eating our MSP margin. Cyber Infrastructure on our own servers cut per-TB costs by more than half. That's the ROI conversation.”
“Software-defined on commodity hardware meant no appliance tax — we scaled by adding standard servers, not buying the vendor's marked-up boxes.”
“It's the target Cyber Protect Cloud writes to natively — storage and backup from one vendor, one architecture. No integration project.”
“Hyper-converged means our DR workloads run on the same kit that stores the backups. The DR site and the backup target became one thing.”
“Residency rules meant we needed storage on our own infrastructure — this delivered it, cyber-hardened, multi-tenant.”
“It's infrastructure — expect an infrastructure project, not a SaaS signup. Plan the deployment properly; the payoff is the owned economics.”
“Cyber Frame extending into virtualization is promising — the VMware-alternative pressure is real, and having it on the same platform matters.”
“For a small MSP the deployment effort may outweigh the savings — it's a scale play. Model your TB volume before committing.”
Analyst firms bury this view behind paywalls, and G2 retired its Grid. So here’s TechBag’s synthesis of the backup infrastructure market — tap any vendor to see why it sits where it does.
Execution strength vs product vision — the classic market map, minus the paywall.
Acronis-native SDS/HCI, owned economics — this page's subject.
The grid nobody publishes — how much margin you own vs how much you must operate.
Purpose-built for the Acronis backup target at commodity economics — the provider corner.
Positions are TechBag’s illustrative synthesis of public review-platform data and vendor documentation — not a reproduction of any analyst graphic. Verify before relying on it.
The rented cloud, the appliance vendors and the DIY paths — honest lanes, including when renting wins.
| Dimension | Cyber Infrastructure | Public cloud storage | Proprietary appliances | Ceph (DIY) | Nutanix/VMware HCI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| What it is | SDS/HCI + Acronis-native | Rented capacity | Vendor boxes | Open-source SDS | Enterprise HCI |
| Economics for MSP backup storage | Owned, commodity | Meter forever | Appliance tax | Cheapest (your time) | Premium |
| Acronis platform integration | Native target | Supported | Supported | Supported | Supported |
| Multi-tenancy | MSP-native | Via accounts | Configurable | DIY | Yes |
| Ops burden | Infrastructure project | None | Vendor-managed-ish | You are the vendor | Managed HCI |
| Beyond storage (DR/virtualization) | HCI + Cyber Frame | Cloud compute | Storage only | Compute-adjacent | Full HCI |
| Best fit | Acronis MSPs owning their economics | Zero-ops, small volume | Appliance-standardised shops | Ceph-capable teams | Enterprise HCI buyers |
Honest fit signals — because the fastest way to lose your trust is to pretend one product wins every scenario.
Drag the sliders (count protected TB; IT-hour cost as loaded rate). Estimates assume the rented-cloud premium plus ~1 hour per TB per year of meter management, with ~65% of the storage cost recoverable by owning commodity infrastructure at scale — deployment ops offset a portion; model the crossover. Illustrative.
Loaded cost = salary + overheads per productive hour. Illustrative only — your TechBag quote models actual device counts and modules.
Cyber Infrastructure prices per TB on commodity hardware you provide. TechBag models owned-vs-rented at your volume in one GST quote.
Best for owning the target
Best for unified DR
Best for virtualization
Whatever the list prices above, TechBag negotiates a significantly better deal — with GST-compliant INR invoicing and local support. Ask us for your discounted quote.
Tell us your device counts and current tools — we’ll model it against what you spend today.
Take this into your next vendor call — including ours.
Model owned (Cyber Infrastructure + commodity hardware + ops) vs rented (cloud meter) at YOUR TB volume — the crossover is the decision.
It's a scale play — small MSPs may find deploy effort outweighs savings. Model your volume honestly.
Confirm Cyber Protect Cloud writes to it natively — the integration is the advantage over generic storage.
Spin a DR workload up on the HCI — the compute-plus-storage unification, tested.
If residency drives it, confirm your hardware location satisfies the mandate.
It's infrastructure — budget the deployment and ops. The payoff is owned economics, not zero-ops.
If virtualization migration is on your radar, evaluate Cyber Frame's direction now.
Spec the commodity hardware properly — the software-defined economics depend on right-sized nodes.
Get an owned-vs-rented model at your TB volume, or scope a deployment PoC and let a TechBag advisor validate the native-target integration.
Stats, ratings, review counts and pricing are illustrative and sourced from public materials; verify before purchase.