- BFSIBanking, Financial Services & Insurance
- HealthcareComing soon
- ManufacturingComing soon
- Retail & E-CommerceComing soon
THC-Hydra
THC-Hydra is a free, open-source online network login tester for authorized pentests, audits, CTFs & education — it tries logins against a live service to prove where weak credentials would let someone in. Hydra exposes the weakness; the value is the DEFENSIVE stack (MFA, PAM, scanning) that fixes it. TechBag sells the fix, not the tool.
Buy through TechBag
Same software. Better outcome — at no extra cost.
Free, vendor-neutral, 30 minutes
How it’s rated
Full scoreboard ↓Quick answer
THC-Hydra — free, open-source login tester
This page covers THC-Hydra (a free, open-source tool — there’s no license to buy). Explore the wider TechBag catalogue — including the defensive controls that fix what it exposes:
Quick facts
30-second orientation- What it is
- Fast network LOGIN cracker (online password test)
- Maintainer
- The Hacker’s Choice (THC) · van Hauser + D. Maciejak
- The category
- Credential-security testing (open-source)
- Online, not offline
- Tests LIVE logins (vs John/Hashcat on hashes)
- Protocols
- 50+ modules: SSH, FTP, HTTP, SMB, RDP, LDAP…
- License / cost
- AGPL-3.0 · FREE / open-source · no license to buy
- Latest release
- v9.7 (May 2024) · maintained, slow cadence
- Reach
- Ships in Kali & Parrot · ~12k GitHub stars
- Use ONLY for
- Authorized pentests, audits, CTFs, education
- The value TechBag sells
- The DEFENSIVE stack: MFA, PAM, vuln scanning
Understand online credential testing before you defend against it
Most product pages skip this. We start here — so you buy a capability, not a buzzword.
What is THC-Hydra?
A free, open-source online network login cracker — a credential-strength TESTER for authorized pentests, audits, CTFs and education. It tries logins against a live service (SSH, RDP, web forms, SMB & 50+ more) to answer one question: ‘can I log in?’
Old view of a password test vs the defensive view — the honest table
What consolidation actually replaces, dimension by dimension.
| Dimension | Unprotected / signature email | THC-Hydra |
|---|---|---|
| The question asked | ‘Are our passwords strong?’ (on paper) | ‘Can I actually log in?’ (tested) |
| Online vs offline | Confused with hash cracking | ONLINE — tests the live service |
| vs John / Hashcat | Seen as competitors | Complementary — offline on hashes |
| A successful guess | ‘A win’ | A FINDING to fix with MFA/PAM |
| The tool’s noise | A weakness | A live test of your monitoring |
| Cost model | Buy the scanner | Free tool — buy the DEFENCES |
| Authorization | (assumed) | Written permission, always |
| The deliverable | A report of holes | MFA, PAM, lockout, detection deployed |
THC-Hydra is a free, open-source ONLINE network login tester for AUTHORIZED use only (pentests, audits, CTFs, education). It’s ONLINE (tests live logins) — the opposite of OFFLINE hash crackers John the Ripper and Hashcat — and it’s noisy, slow and defeated by good hygiene: MFA neutralizes it, PAM removes the static password, lockout starves it, detection catches it. Hydra is free — TechBag sells the fix: MFA (Okta, miniOrange), PAM (CyberArk, BeyondTrust, Securden, One Identity) and scanning (Qualys, Tenable), with INR/GST/PO.
The five pieces of the platform
Vendors love diagrams; buyers need to know what they’re actually operating. Here’s the whole platform, demystified.
Authorize First
Nothing on this page is a how-to. Hydra is a TESTING tool, and every legitimate use starts the same way: a defined scope and WRITTEN authorization for the systems in it. Running a login cracker against systems you don’t own or lack permission to test is illegal — the author’s own README asks for ‘LEGAL PURPOSES ONLY’. Permission first. No exceptions.
Test (the authorized run)
Within an authorized engagement, Hydra tests a LIVE service — SSH, FTP, an HTTP login form, SMB, RDP and 50+ others — trying username/password combinations in parallel from a wordlist or character set. It is an ONLINE test (it talks to a running service), so it is deliberately slow and noisy compared with offline hash cracking. It answers one question: ‘do weak credentials let someone in?’ Test the live login. One blunt question.
Expose (what it reveals)
The output isn’t ‘a win’ — it’s a finding. A successful guess exposes a weak, reused or default credential that a real attacker could use. Just as important is what your DEFENSES did while it ran: if your logs lit up, your monitoring works; if account lockouts fired, your policy works; if nothing noticed, that silence is the finding. Expose the weakness — and test whether anything was watching.
Defend (fix what it found)
This is the point of the whole exercise. Every credential Hydra could guess is one that MFA would have made useless, that PAM and rotation would have removed, that a lockout policy would have starved, and that detection would have caught. The engagement ends not with the tool but with the controls: MFA/IAM, privileged-access management, and the alerting that turns Hydra’s noise into early warning. Fix what it found. That is the deliverable.
Buy the Controls
Hydra is free — the value isn’t a license, it’s the lesson. The commercial tooling that closes the gap is what TechBag sells: MFA/IAM (Okta, miniOrange), PAM (CyberArk, BeyondTrust, Securden, One Identity) and vulnerability/exposure scanning (Qualys, Tenable) — with INR invoicing, 18% GST and PO support. Turn the finding into a fix. That’s the purchase.
One agent on every machine, one console over all of them — modules attach without a second operational world.
Twelve capabilities. Test, expose, defend.
THC-Hydra tests, in the open, how weak credentials hold up against a live login — a free, open-source proof-of-concept from portfolio, and paired with the human firewall.
Tests LIVE Services (Online, Not Offline)
Hydra talks to a running service to test whether weak credentials grant access — an ONLINE test. This is the opposite of offline hash cracking (John/Hashcat): slower and noisier, but it measures the real-world login exactly as an attacker would meet it. Online by design. It answers ‘can I log in?’
50+ Protocol Modules
SSH, FTP, HTTP(S) login forms, SMB, RDP, VNC, LDAP, SMTP, databases and dozens more — Hydra’s breadth is its signature. For a defender, the list is a map of every credentialed surface an attacker might probe, and every one that MFA and PAM should cover. Broad coverage. A map of what to defend.
Massively Parallel (16 Tasks Default)
Hydra runs many attempts at once (16 by default) — which is exactly what rate-limiting and account-lockout policies are designed to starve. Understanding its parallel model is understanding why lockout and throttling are such effective defenses against online attacks. Fast in parallel. Which is why lockout beats it.
Wordlist & Brute-Force Modes
Hydra works from wordlists (dictionary lists of likely passwords) or generated character sets (brute-force). The takeaway for defenders is blunt: any password on a common list, or short enough to enumerate, is not a password — it’s a delay. Password policy and passphrases matter. Weak lists fall. Length and MFA don’t.
Bundled in Kali & Parrot OS
Hydra ships by default in Kali Linux and Parrot OS — the standard authorized-pentest distributions — so it’s already in the toolkit of every legitimate security tester. For a buyer, that ubiquity is the reason to assume attackers have it too, and to defend accordingly. Everywhere in pentesting. Assume the attacker has it.
Reveals Weak, Reused & Default Credentials
A successful Hydra run in an authorized test is a FINDING: a weak, reused or default credential that a real attacker could exploit. That finding is the whole value — it tells you precisely which accounts need MFA, rotation or PAM before someone hostile finds them first. Every hit is a to-do. Fix it before an attacker finds it.
Tests Whether Anyone Is Watching
An online brute-force is noisy on purpose. If your SIEM, IDS/IPS or WAF light up while Hydra runs, your detection works; if nothing notices, that silence is itself a critical finding. Hydra doubles as a live test of your monitoring and alerting. If your logs light up, good. If not, that’s the gap.
Turns ‘Weak Passwords’ Into a Priority List
Instead of an abstract ‘use strong passwords’ policy, an authorized Hydra assessment produces a concrete, prioritized list of the accounts and services most exposed — the exact places to deploy MFA, PAM and lockout first. Evidence beats exhortation. A ranked list, not a slogan.
MFA Neutralizes It — Okta, miniOrange
The single most effective defeat for online brute-force is multi-factor authentication: even a guessed password is useless without the second factor. TechBag supplies MFA/IAM (Okta, miniOrange) that turns the credential Hydra found into a dead end. The best single control. A guessed password stops mattering.
PAM Removes the Weak Credential — CyberArk, BeyondTrust, Securden, One Identity
Privileged-access management vaults, rotates and brokers credentials so that the static, reusable, long-lived password Hydra thrives on simply doesn’t exist. TechBag supplies PAM (CyberArk, BeyondTrust, Securden, One Identity) to take the target off the table. No standing password to guess. PAM removes the prize.
Lockout & Rate-Limiting Starve the Parallel Model
Hydra’s power is running many attempts fast; account lockout, throttling and progressive delays starve exactly that model, turning thousands of guesses into a handful before the door shuts. It’s a configuration win — and TechBag helps scope the IAM/PAM that enforces it. Slow the attempts, break the attack. Config that pays for itself.
Vuln Scanning & Alerting — Qualys, Tenable
Vulnerability and exposure scanning (Qualys, Tenable) finds the default logins, exposed services and weak configurations BEFORE a tester (or attacker) tries them, while detection/alerting turns online brute-force noise into early warning. TechBag supplies both. Find it before Hydra does. Then get alerted if anyone tries.
Understand THC-Hydra (community & educational videos)
The overview, getting started, and protecting M365 email.
Brute Force SSH & Build a Honeypot (Hydra + Cowrie)
Community walkthrough that pairs Hydra with a DEFENSIVE honeypot — the defender’s view.
Hacking Tools: Hydra
Community/educational overview of what Hydra is and where it fits in authorized testing.
Web Brute Forcing with THC-Hydra
Community explainer on Hydra against web login forms — educational context only.
Want a live, India-context walkthrough on your own fleet?
Book a guided demo →The endpoint catches what arrives. Email stops it arriving.
Here’s what genuinely sets THC-Hydra apart — and why good defenses (MFA, PAM, detection) beat it.
It answers one blunt question — ‘can I log in?’ — so you can fix the answer
The single reason authorized security teams reach for THC-Hydra is that it answers, empirically, the question every attacker asks first: ‘can I log in with a weak, reused or default credential?’ The problem it solves: password policy on paper is not the same as password strength in reality — teams believe their credentials are strong until something tests them. What Hydra provides (in an authorized engagement): a concrete, evidence-based answer for live services — SSH, RDP, web login forms, databases and 50+ more — showing exactly which accounts would fall to an online guessing attack. Why it matters: you cannot fix a risk you can’t see, and Hydra converts a vague worry (‘are our passwords good enough?’) into a specific, prioritized finding you can act on with MFA, PAM and lockout. The value: an honest, real-world test of credential strength — the input to a defensive fix, not an end in itself. TechBag’s role is the fix: we sell the MFA, PAM and scanning that close the gap Hydra reveals. TechBag helps you fix what a test like this exposes.
Online, not offline — it tests the real login exactly as an attacker meets it
A defining strength of Hydra is that it is an ONLINE tool: it tests a live, running service, exactly as a real attacker would encounter it — which is a fundamentally different (and complementary) job from offline hash cracking. The distinction matters enormously for defenders. Hydra hammers a running login and asks ‘can I get in?’ — it is slow, noisy and defeatable by your defenses (lockout, MFA, rate-limiting, detection). Offline crackers like John the Ripper and Hashcat do the opposite: they take password HASHES you already captured and crack them locally at huge speed (Hashcat is GPU-accelerated) with no network involved and nothing for your live defenses to notice. In a real authorized engagement the two are used TOGETHER — Hydra to test live logins, John/Hashcat to recover passwords from captured hashes. Why it matters for buyers: because Hydra is online, your live controls actually get a vote — MFA, lockout and detection can defeat it in real time, which is precisely why they’re worth buying. The value: Hydra measures the login your defenses actually guard — so the controls TechBag sells (MFA, PAM, detection) directly change the outcome. TechBag helps you deploy the live controls that beat an online attack.
Free and ubiquitous — which is exactly why you must assume attackers have it too
Hydra is free, open-source (AGPL-3.0) and ships by default in Kali Linux and Parrot OS — the standard authorized-pentest distributions — so it is already in the toolkit of every legitimate tester. The problem this frames: a tool this capable and this available is, by definition, also available to attackers — there is no barrier to entry. What that means for defenders: you should assume that any internet-facing login, and any weak internal credential, could be probed by exactly this class of tool — and defend accordingly. Why it matters: the right response to a free, ubiquitous credential-guessing tool is not to hope, but to make guessing pointless — MFA so a guessed password is useless, PAM so there’s no static password to guess, lockout/rate-limiting so the parallel model stalls, and detection so an attempt becomes an alert. The value: Hydra’s ubiquity is the honest case for taking credential defense seriously — and for buying the controls that make it moot. TechBag supplies precisely those controls (MFA, PAM, scanning, detection). TechBag helps you defend against tools that are already everywhere.
Its noise is a feature — it doubles as a live test of your monitoring
An online brute-force is loud by design, and that noisiness — often called a weakness — is genuinely useful to a defender: Hydra doubles as a live test of whether anyone is watching. The problem it surfaces: many organisations invest in a SIEM, IDS/IPS or WAF but never verify that these tools would actually catch a credential attack in progress. What an authorized Hydra run reveals: whether your detection lights up, whether account lockouts fire, and whether alerts reach a human — or whether the attempt passes in silence. If your logs light up, your monitoring works; if they don’t, that silence is one of the most important findings an assessment can produce. Why it matters: detection and alerting turn an online attack’s inherent noise into early warning — but only if they’re configured and tested. The value: Hydra’s noise is an opportunity to prove (or disprove) your monitoring, and to fix the gaps. TechBag supplies the exposure scanning and helps scope the detection that turns noise into an alert. TechBag helps you make sure someone is actually watching.
It’s free — so the value isn’t a license, it’s the lesson (and the fix)
Because THC-Hydra costs nothing, there is no license for TechBag — or anyone — to sell you; the honest commercial value sits entirely on the other side of the finding, in the DEFENSIVE stack that fixes what Hydra exposes. The reframing: don’t buy the tool that finds the problem — buy the controls that solve it. Every credential Hydra can guess is one that MFA would render useless, that PAM and rotation would remove, that a lockout policy would starve, and that detection would catch. What TechBag actually supplies: MFA/IAM (Okta, miniOrange) — the single best defeat for online brute-force; privileged-access management (CyberArk, BeyondTrust, Securden, One Identity) — so the static password Hydra hunts simply doesn’t exist; and vulnerability/exposure scanning (Qualys, Tenable) — to find weak and default logins before anyone tests them. Why it matters: a free tool with no vendor still teaches an expensive lesson — and the responsible response is to invest in the controls, not the exploit. The value: Hydra is the free diagnosis; the commercial cure is MFA, PAM and scanning. TechBag adds INR invoicing, 18% GST and PO support on all of it. TechBag helps you buy the fix, not the finding.
The honest scope
THC-Hydra is a free, open-source (AGPL-3.0) online network login cracker — a credential-strength TESTING tool for AUTHORIZED penetration tests, security audits, CTFs and education, maintained by The Hacker’s Choice (van Hauser, with protocol modules by David Maciejak; ~12k GitHub stars, latest v9.7, May 2024, maintained at a slow-but-steady cadence). The honest framing — what it is, its real limits, and why good defenses beat it: (1) AUTHORIZED USE ONLY. Running Hydra against systems you don’t own or lack WRITTEN authorization to test is illegal; the author’s own README asks that it be used ‘FOR LEGAL PURPOSES ONLY’ and not for illegal purposes. This page is defensive and educational — what the tool is and why defenses defeat it — not a how-to. (2) It is NOISY and DETECTABLE by design — it triggers account lockouts, IDS/IPS, WAF and SIEM alerts. Framed positively: if your logs light up, your monitoring works; if they don’t, that’s a gap worth closing. (3) It is SLOW compared with offline cracking, because it’s rate-limited by the network and the target service — the opposite of GPU-fast offline tools like Hashcat. (4) It is DEFEATED by good hygiene: MFA neutralizes it almost entirely (a guessed password is useless without the second factor); rate-limiting and lockout starve its parallel model; PAM plus rotated credentials remove the weak, static passwords it hunts; and detection/alerting turn its noise into early warning. Each limitation is really a signpost to a control: (2) → detection/scanning (Qualys, Tenable); (4) → MFA/IAM (Okta, miniOrange) and PAM (CyberArk, BeyondTrust, Securden, One Identity). So the honest positioning: Hydra is a legitimate, valuable tool for authorized credential testing — and the responsible, commercial response to what it finds is to buy the defensive stack that makes weak credentials a non-issue. TechBag doesn’t sell Hydra; TechBag sells the MFA, PAM and scanning that beat it — with INR invoicing, 18% GST and PO support.
The numbers behind the platform
What an authorized THC-Hydra engagement looks like (and the fix after)
Authorize & scope (this comes first)
Every legitimate use starts with WRITTEN authorization and a defined scope — the systems you own or are contracted to test. TechBag’s focus isn’t the tool; it’s making sure the engagement is legal and that you’re ready to act on what it finds with real controls.
Test & expose (authorized)
Within scope, an authorized tester uses Hydra to see which live logins fall to weak credentials — and whether your monitoring notices. The output is a prioritized FINDING: the accounts and services most exposed. Not a win — a to-do list.
Defend — deploy the fix
Turn every finding into a control: MFA/IAM (Okta, miniOrange) so guessed passwords are useless, PAM (CyberArk, BeyondTrust, Securden, One Identity) so static passwords don’t exist, and lockout/rate-limiting to starve the attack. TechBag scopes and invoices this in INR + 18% GST.
Scan, detect & re-test
Find weak and default logins BEFORE anyone tests them with vulnerability scanning (Qualys, Tenable), and make sure detection turns any future brute-force noise into an alert. Re-test to prove the fix held. TechBag supports the whole loop locally.
Trusted across regulated industries in 100+ countries
The review scoreboard
Modelled on Gartner Peer Insights structure. *Counts and breakdowns are illustrative pending verified review collection.
Quick poll — what’s driving your evaluation?
Talk to an advisor“In our authorized assessment, Hydra proved in minutes that three service accounts still had weak passwords. The finding is the point — we rolled MFA and PAM to those accounts the same week. TechBag supplied the fix.”
“The best thing Hydra did on our engagement was tell us our SIEM DIDN’T alert. Silence during an online brute-force was the finding. We closed the detection gap with TechBag’s help.”
“People forget Hydra is ONLINE — it tests the live login. We pair it with offline tools on captured hashes for the full picture. For the live side, MFA ended the whole problem; TechBag scoped Okta for us.”
“It’s free, so there was nothing to buy from the tool — but plenty to fix. TechBag turned our Hydra findings into a PAM rollout (CyberArk) with INR billing and a clean PO. Honest, defensive advice.”
“Hydra is noisy and slow — and that’s exactly why lockout and rate-limiting work. Watching our policy starve a parallel run was the most persuasive security demo our board ever saw. TechBag helped us harden it.”
“For CTFs and training it’s a staple, and it ships in Kali so it’s always there. But the lesson we take to clients is defensive: every weak credential it finds is one MFA would have saved. TechBag sells that MFA.”
“Latest release is a couple of years old, which worried us — but it’s maintained, not abandoned, and does its one job well. The real work was our side: vuln scanning with Qualys found the default logins first.”
“We were candid with our auditor that authorization and scope come first — written permission, defined targets. TechBag reinforced the same discipline and focused us on the defensive controls, not the tool.”
Where everyone sits — the grids
Analyst firms bury this view behind paywalls, and G2 retired its Grid. So here’s TechBag’s synthesis of the credential-security testing market — tap any vendor to see why it sits where it does.
TechBag Email-Security Grid
Execution strength vs product vision — the classic market map, minus the paywall.
Broadest ONLINE login tester. This page's tool.
Detection × Portfolio Integration
The grid nobody publishes — how strong the email detection is vs how integrated with the wider security portfolio.
Online protocol breadth.
Positions are TechBag’s illustrative synthesis of public review-platform data and vendor documentation — not a reproduction of any analyst graphic. Verify before relying on it.
THC-Hydra vs the credential-testing field
Medusa, Ncrack and Patator are the other ONLINE login testers; John the Ripper and Hashcat are OFFLINE hash crackers (a different, complementary job). The key distinction: Hydra asks ‘can I log in?’; John/Hashcat ask ‘what was the password behind this hash?’ We say so honestly.
| Dimension | THC-Hydra | Medusa | Ncrack | Patator | John the Ripper | Hashcat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Online vs offline | ONLINE — tests live services | ONLINE — live services | ONLINE — network-focused | ONLINE — modular | OFFLINE — cracks hashes | OFFLINE — GPU hash cracking |
| Protocol breadth | 50+ protocols — the broadest | Broad, fewer than Hydra | Narrower (RDP/SSH focus) | Flexible/modular | N/A (offline) | N/A (offline) |
| Design / stability | Mature, parallel; slow release cadence | Similar design; some prefer its stability | Tight Nmap-team integration | Flexible but steeper learning curve | Very mature offline standard | Fastest (GPU) offline |
| Speed | Rate-limited by the network/service | Network-bound (online) | Network-bound (online) | Network-bound (online) | Fast (local, offline) | Fastest (GPU, offline) |
| Best fit (authorized testing) | Broad online login testing across many protocols | Closest online peer — some prefer its stability | Network sweeps with Nmap (RDP/SSH) | Flexible modular online testing (Python) | Cracking captured hashes (offline) | GPU-fast hash cracking (offline) |
Which email-security approach fits you?
Honest fit signals — because the fastest way to lose your trust is to pretend one product wins every scenario.
Reach for THC-Hydra if…
- ✓You are running an AUTHORIZED pentest, audit, CTF or lesson and need to test ONLINE login strength across many protocols (SSH, RDP, web forms, SMB…)
- ✓You want the broadest protocol coverage of the online login-testers and a tool that already ships in Kali/Parrot
- ✓You understand its output is a FINDING to fix — not an end in itself
- ✓You’ll pair the finding with the fix: MFA, PAM, lockout and detection (the stack TechBag actually sells)
Medusa if…
- ✓You want the closest ONLINE peer — a similar parallel design with fewer protocols that some testers prefer for stability
Ncrack if…
- ✓You want tight integration with an Nmap-driven network sweep — narrower protocols, RDP/SSH focus, from the Nmap team
Patator if…
- ✓You want a flexible, modular Python tool and can accept a steeper learning curve for the extra flexibility
John the Ripper / Hashcat if…
- ✓You need to crack captured HASHES OFFLINE (complementary, not competing) — Hashcat is GPU-fast; in a real engagement you use these alongside Hydra, not instead of it
What do email threats cost you?
Drag the sliders (accounts/logins in scope; sessions or services per month; IT-hour cost as loaded incident rate). Estimates contrast an UNDEFENDED credential posture (weak/reused/default passwords, no MFA, no lockout, no alerting) vs a DEFENDED one (MFA neutralizes guesses, PAM removes static passwords, lockout starves brute-force, detection turns noise into alerts) — the wins are guessable credentials removed, brute-force attempts starved, and breaches avoided (the largest, unpriced win). Illustrative — TechBag scopes the MFA/PAM/scanning for your environment.
Loaded cost = salary + overheads per productive hour. Illustrative only — your TechBag quote models actual device counts and modules.
Three ways to consume it
THC-Hydra is FREE / open-source (AGPL-3.0) — there is NO license to buy. Hydra is free; the value isn’t a license, it’s the lesson. Every credential Hydra can guess is one MFA, PAM and a lockout policy would have stopped. So the commercial line is the DEFENSIVE stack that closes that gap: MFA/IAM (Okta, miniOrange), PAM (CyberArk, BeyondTrust, Securden, One Identity) and vuln/exposure scanning (Qualys, Tenable). TechBag scopes and supplies those defences with INR invoicing, 18% GST and PO/procurement support — the fix, not the free tool.
THC-Hydra (the tool)
Free — the diagnosis
- Open-source, AGPL-3.0 — no license to buy; ships in Kali/Parrot
- Authorized use only: pentests, audits, CTFs, education
- Its output is a FINDING — weak credentials to fix, not a purchase
+ Platform add-ons
Best for a broader rollout
- Scoped to your estate
- Add-on modules as needed
- Phased, right-sized deployment
The DEFENSIVE stack (the cure)
What TechBag sells
- MFA/IAM (Okta, miniOrange) — the best defeat for online brute-force
- PAM (CyberArk, BeyondTrust, Securden, One Identity) — removes the static password + Qualys/Tenable scanning
- TechBag adds INR invoicing, 18% GST & procurement/PO support
Buy it for less — TechBag pricing beats list
Whatever the list prices above, TechBag negotiates a significantly better deal — with GST-compliant INR invoicing and local support. Ask us for your discounted quote.
Get an India-ready quote
Tell us your device counts and current tools — we’ll model it against what you spend today.
The 8 questions to ask every vendor
Take this into your next vendor call — including ours.
Do you have WRITTEN permission and a defined scope? Nothing else is legitimate — authorized pentests, audits, CTFs and education only.
Clear that Hydra is ONLINE (tests live logins) and John/Hashcat are OFFLINE (crack hashes)? They’re complementary, not competing.
Is MFA deployed on every login that matters? It’s the single best defeat for online brute-force — TechBag supplies Okta / miniOrange.
Are privileged, static passwords vaulted and rotated? PAM (CyberArk, BeyondTrust, Securden, One Identity) removes the target Hydra hunts.
Do account lockout and throttling starve a parallel attack? It’s a config win — TechBag helps scope the IAM/PAM that enforces it.
Would your SIEM/IDS actually alert on a brute-force? If Hydra runs and nothing lights up, that silence is the finding to close.
Are default and exposed logins found BEFORE anyone tests them? Vuln scanning (Qualys, Tenable) gets there first — via TechBag.
Hydra is free — TechBag sells the DEFENCES that fix what it exposes, with INR invoicing, 18% GST and PO/procurement support.
Questions buyers ask
Ready to fix what a login test would find?
Understand THC-Hydra (a free, open-source ONLINE login tester for authorized pentests, audits, CTFs and education — it exposes weak credentials so you can fix them) — then let a TechBag advisor scope the DEFENSIVE stack that beats it: MFA (Okta, miniOrange), PAM (CyberArk, BeyondTrust, Securden, One Identity) and vuln scanning (Qualys, Tenable), with INR invoicing, 18% GST and PO support.
Stats, ratings, review counts and pricing are illustrative and sourced from public materials; verify before purchase.