- BFSIBanking, Financial Services & Insurance
- HealthcareComing soon
- ManufacturingComing soon
- Retail & E-CommerceComing soon
Wiz Code
Secure the front door. Email is where most attacks arrive — Wiz Code shifts Wiz left — scan IaC, code/SCA, secrets, pipelines & container images pre-deploy, with 1-click fix PRs in developers’ tools. Its differentiator: code-to-cloud correlation — the running-cloud context no pure AppSec tool has.
Buy through TechBag
Same software. Better outcome — at no extra cost.
Free, vendor-neutral, 30 minutes
How it’s rated
Full scoreboard ↓Quick answer
The Wiz platform family
This page covers Wiz Code — shift-left ASPM. The rest of the Wiz suite:
Quick facts
30-second orientation- Product
- Wiz Code — shift-left ASPM
- Vendor
- Wiz (founded Jan 2020 · Israel)
- The category
- App security posture mgmt (ASPM) / shift-left
- What it does
- Scan IaC/code/secrets/pipelines/images pre-deploy
- The differentiator
- Code-to-cloud correlation (two-way)
- Developer UX
- 1-click fix PRs in the tools they use
- Deployment
- Connect repos, CI/CD & registries
- Now owned by
- Google/Alphabet (~$32B, closed Mar 2026)
- Vs
- Snyk, Prisma (Bridgecrew), Aqua, GHAS, Endor
- In India via
- TechBag — scoping, honest compare, GST
Understand shift-left cloud security before you buy it
Most product pages skip this. We start here — so you buy a capability, not a buzzword.
What is Wiz Code?
Shift-left ASPM — scan IaC, code/SCA, secrets, pipelines & container images pre-deploy, with 1-click fix PRs. Its edge: code-to-cloud correlation — the running-cloud context no pure AppSec tool has.
Code-only scanners vs Wiz code-to-cloud correlation — the honest table
What consolidation actually replaces, dimension by dimension.
| Dimension | Unprotected / signature email | Wiz Code (Wiz) |
|---|---|---|
| When risk is caught | In production (expensive) | In the pipeline (pre-deploy) |
| Context | Code-only (blind to cloud) | Code-to-cloud (two-way) |
| Prioritisation | Every theoretical finding | What maps to real cloud risk |
| Root cause | Fix the symptom repeatedly | Trace to the code, fix once |
| Developer UX | Separate portal, friction | In IDE/PR — 1-click fix PRs |
| The loop | AppSec & cloud siloed | Build-to-run on one graph |
| Best when | (varies) | You run Wiz Cloud (correlation) |
| Best fit | (varies) | Shift-left correlated to your running cloud |
Wiz Code is shift-left ASPM — scan IaC, code/SCA, secrets, pipelines & container images pre-deploy, with 1-click fix PRs — and its differentiator is code-to-cloud correlation (trace production risk to its root in code; prioritise by real cloud reachability). Honest: it’s most compelling BECAUSE you run Wiz Cloud (the correlation is the point); as a first standalone AppSec buy, Snyk is more developer-loved and Aqua/Trivy stronger for containers. Premium & quote-only. TechBag scopes it & adds GST.
The five pieces of the platform
Vendors love diagrams; buyers need to know what they’re actually operating. Here’s the whole platform, demystified.
Scan the Pipeline (Shift-Left)
Wiz Code scans infrastructure-as-code (Terraform, CloudFormation, Kubernetes), application code and dependencies (SCA), exposed secrets, CI/CD pipelines and container images — catching risks BEFORE they deploy. Fix it in the pipeline, not in production. Shift the fix left.
Meet Developers in Their Tools
Findings surface where developers already work — the IDE, the pull request, the CI run — and Wiz opens 1-click FIX PRs with the remediation. Security in the developer’s flow, not a separate portal. Fix by merging a PR.
Correlate Code to Cloud
The heart of Wiz Code: because Wiz also sees your RUNNING cloud (CSPM + the Security Graph), it links code to cloud BOTH ways — trace a production risk back to the exact IaC/code/image that caused it, and know which code issues matter because they map to a real, exposed cloud resource. The context no pure AppSec tool has.
Prioritise by Real Cloud Risk
Instead of drowning developers in every possible finding, Wiz Code ranks issues by whether they map to a REAL, exposed, reachable cloud resource on the graph — so teams fix the code that genuinely creates production risk first. Fix the code that matters. Not every theoretical finding.
Fix Before Deploy
Wiz Code lets you set guardrails and policy-as-code to block risky changes from deploying — stopping the misconfiguration or vulnerability at the source, before it becomes a cloud finding. Prevent, don’t just detect. Close the loop from code to cloud. (Standalone AppSec depth is where Snyk leads — see honest scope.)
One agent on every machine, one console over all of them — modules attach without a second operational world.
Twelve capabilities. Scan, correlate, fix.
Wiz Code traces production risk to its root in code — code-to-cloud, in the pipeline — part of portfolio, and paired with the human firewall.
Infrastructure-as-Code Scanning
Scan Terraform, CloudFormation and Kubernetes manifests for misconfigurations before they deploy — catching the cloud misconfig at its source, in the code. Fix the misconfig in the IaC. Before it becomes a cloud finding.
Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
Scan application dependencies and open-source packages for known vulnerabilities — so a risky library is caught in the build, not in production. Know your dependencies. (Snyk’s SCA is deeper as a standalone — see honest scope.)
Secret Detection
Detect hardcoded secrets, keys and tokens in code and pipelines before they leak — the credentials attackers hunt for. Catch the secret in the commit. Before it’s in a public repo.
CI/CD Pipeline Security
Secure the CI/CD pipeline itself — misconfigured runners, risky workflows, supply-chain weaknesses — so the path to production is trustworthy. Secure the pipeline. The supply chain is an attack surface.
Container Image Scanning
Scan container images for vulnerabilities before they ship to the registry and run — catching the vulnerable image pre-deploy. Ship clean images. (Aqua/Trivy are very strong here — see honest scope.)
Code-to-Cloud Correlation
The differentiator: because Wiz sees the running cloud, it links a production risk to the exact IaC/code/image that caused it — and tells you which code issues map to a real, exposed cloud resource. Two-way trace. The context no pure AppSec tool has.
Root-Cause Tracing
Trace a cloud finding back to its ROOT CAUSE in code — the specific Terraform block, code line or image layer — so you fix the source, not just the symptom, and stop it recurring. Fix the root, not the symptom. Stop the recurrence.
Cloud-Reachability Prioritisation
Rank code findings by whether they map to a REAL, exposed, reachable cloud resource — so developers fix what actually creates production risk, not every theoretical CVE. Fix what’s reachable. End developer alert fatigue.
In-IDE & In-PR Findings
Surface findings in the IDE, the pull request and the CI run — where developers already work — so security is part of the flow, not a separate portal to check. Meet developers where they are. Security in the flow.
1-Click Fix Pull Requests
Wiz opens a pull request with the fix — so remediation is a merge, not a research project. From finding to fixed in one click. Developers fix by merging.
Guardrails & Policy-as-Code
Set guardrails and policy-as-code to BLOCK risky changes from deploying — preventing the misconfig or vulnerability at the source. Prevent, don’t just detect. Stop it before production.
Part of One Agentless CNAPP
Wiz Code shares the Security Graph with CSPM, CIEM, DSPM and Wiz Defend (see those pages) — so shift-left and runtime close the loop from code to cloud. One graph, code included. The loop closed. (Best when you run Wiz Cloud — that’s the point.)
Watch Wiz in action
The overview, getting started, and protecting M365 email.
What Is Software Composition Analysis (SCA)?
Scanning dependencies, explained.
What is API Security Posture Management?
Securing what you build, pre-deploy.
Wiz Intro — Secure Everything You Build and Run in the Cloud
‘Build and run’ — the whole point of Wiz Code.
Want a live, India-context walkthrough on your own fleet?
Book a guided demo →The endpoint catches what arrives. Email stops it arriving.
Here’s what genuinely sets Wiz Code apart (and where specialists like Snyk go deeper).
Code-to-cloud correlation — the context no pure AppSec tool has
The single biggest reason to choose Wiz Code is CODE-TO-CLOUD CORRELATION — the two-way link between what you build (code) and what you run (cloud) that no standalone AppSec tool can offer. The problem it solves: a pure shift-left/AppSec scanner sees only the code — it can find thousands of potential issues in IaC, dependencies and images, but it CAN’T tell you which of them actually matter in production, because it has no view of your running cloud. So developers drown in findings with no way to prioritise, and security can’t trace a production incident back to its source in code. What Wiz provides: because Wiz ALSO sees your running cloud (via CSPM and the Security Graph), Wiz Code links code to cloud BOTH ways. Forward: it tells you which code issues genuinely matter because they map to a real, exposed, reachable cloud resource. Backward: it traces a production risk (a misconfigured, internet-exposed resource) all the way back to the exact Terraform block, code line or container image that created it — so you fix the ROOT CAUSE and stop it recurring. Why it matters: shift-left only works if developers fix the RIGHT things — and the only way to know what’s right is running-cloud context. Code-to-cloud correlation turns a firehose of code findings into a prioritised, root-cause-driven worklist, and closes the loop between the security team (who see the cloud) and developers (who own the code). The value: Wiz Code correlates code to cloud both ways — so you fix the code that creates real production risk and trace cloud incidents to their root cause. For shift-left that actually matters, this matters. TechBag helps organisations adopt Wiz Code. TechBag helps you fix the code that creates real cloud risk.
Shift left — catch cloud risk in the pipeline, before deploy
A defining strength of Wiz Code is that it moves security LEFT — into the pipeline, before anything is deployed — so risks are caught and fixed where they’re cheapest to fix: in the code. The problem it solves: fixing a misconfiguration or vulnerability AFTER it’s running in production is expensive, disruptive and repetitive — you fix the same class of issue over and over, because the SOURCE (the IaC template, the base image, the dependency) keeps producing it. Detecting only in production is a treadmill. What Wiz provides: Wiz Code scans infrastructure-as-code (Terraform, CloudFormation, Kubernetes), application dependencies (SCA), secrets, CI/CD pipelines and container images — catching the risk in the pipeline, before it deploys — and lets you set guardrails/policy-as-code to BLOCK risky changes from shipping at all. So the misconfig is fixed in the Terraform, the vulnerable image is caught before it ships, the secret is caught in the commit. Why it matters: shift-left is dramatically cheaper and more durable than production firefighting — fix the source once and every future deployment inherits the fix — and it stops whole classes of production findings from ever existing. Combined with code-to-cloud correlation, you fix the RIGHT things at the source. The value: Wiz Code shifts security left — scanning IaC, code, secrets, pipelines and images pre-deploy, with guardrails to block risky changes — so you fix risk at the source, cheaply. For preventing cloud risk, this matters. TechBag helps organisations shift left with Wiz Code. TechBag helps you fix risk before it ships.
Developer-friendly — fixes in the tools they already use
A key practical strength of Wiz Code is that it meets DEVELOPERS where they already work — in the IDE, the pull request and the CI run — and hands them 1-click FIX PRs, so security is part of their flow rather than a friction-generating gate. The problem it solves: shift-left initiatives fail when security tools bolt on friction — a separate portal developers have to check, findings without fixes, alerts that block builds without explaining why. Developers route around tools that slow them down, and security-vs-speed becomes a fight. What Wiz provides: findings surface in the tools developers already use (IDE, repo, PR, CI), and — crucially — Wiz opens a pull request WITH the fix, so remediation is a merge, not a research project. Combined with cloud-reachability prioritisation (only the findings that map to real cloud risk are pushed hard), developers get a short, relevant, fixable list in their flow. Why it matters: developer adoption is the whole game for shift-left — a tool developers actually use (because it fits their flow and hands them fixes) delivers security; a tool they route around delivers nothing. Wiz Code’s developer UX is built for adoption. (Honest note: as a pure developer AppSec experience, Snyk is even more mature and developer-loved — see the honest scope.) The value: Wiz Code meets developers in their tools with 1-click fix PRs and a prioritised list — so shift-left actually gets adopted. For developer buy-in, this matters. TechBag helps organisations roll out Wiz Code to developers. TechBag helps you make security part of the dev flow.
One CNAPP — shift-left and runtime close the loop
A strength of Wiz Code is that it’s part of ONE agentless CNAPP — so shift-left (code) and runtime (cloud, via CSPM and Wiz Defend) live on the same Security Graph, closing the loop from what you build to what you run. The problem it solves: when shift-left AppSec and cloud security are separate tools, there’s a gap between them — the AppSec tool doesn’t know what’s running, the cloud tool doesn’t know where a running risk came from in code, and the two teams (AppSec and cloud security) work from different data. Risk falls through that gap. What Wiz provides: because Wiz Code shares the Security Graph with CSPM (posture), CIEM (identity), DSPM (data) and Wiz Defend (runtime), the SAME risk is visible from code to cloud to runtime — a vulnerability found in an image pre-deploy can be tracked to where it runs and whether it’s exposed; a runtime detection can be traced back to the code that introduced it. One graph, one story, from build to run. Why it matters: closing the code-to-cloud-to-runtime loop is exactly what ‘cloud security’ should mean — no gaps between tools, one prioritised view, and both dev and security teams working from the same graph. (Honest note: this is most compelling BECAUSE you run Wiz Cloud — the correlation is the point; see the honest scope.) The value: Wiz Code is part of one CNAPP — so shift-left and runtime close the loop on one Security Graph, from build to run. For unified cloud security, this matters. TechBag helps organisations close the loop with Wiz. TechBag helps you unite build and run.
The honest read — compelling because you run Wiz Cloud
A strength stated honestly: Wiz Code’s code-to-cloud correlation is a genuine, compelling differentiator — but it’s important to be clear about WHEN Wiz Code is the right choice. When Wiz Code shines: when you ALSO run Wiz Cloud (CSPM/CNAPP). The whole point is the correlation — tracing production risk to its root in code, and prioritising code findings by real cloud reachability — and that correlation only exists because Wiz sees your running cloud. For a team already on Wiz, adding Wiz Code closes the loop and is highly compelling. Where it’s weaker: as a FIRST, STANDALONE AppSec buy — if you don’t run Wiz Cloud and just want a developer AppSec tool — Wiz Code is a weaker choice than the specialists. Snyk is more mature and more developer-loved (deeper SCA, broader language and IDE support, a larger developer ecosystem and community); Aqua (and open-source Trivy) are very strong specifically for CONTAINERS; GitHub Advanced Security is natural if you’re all-GitHub; and Endor Labs is a strong modern SCA/reachability challenger. Without the running-cloud context, Wiz Code is ‘just’ another good scanner competing with more mature standalone AppSec tools. The value: Wiz Code is highly compelling BECAUSE you run Wiz Cloud (the code-to-cloud correlation is the point) — but as a first standalone AppSec buy, Snyk is more developer-loved and Aqua/Trivy stronger for containers. TechBag gives you the honest read. TechBag scopes whether Wiz Code or a specialist fits your case.
The honest scope
Wiz Code shifts Wiz LEFT — scanning infrastructure-as-code, application code and dependencies (SCA), secrets, CI/CD pipelines and container images before deploy, with 1-click fix PRs in developers’ tools — and its differentiator is CODE-TO-CLOUD CORRELATION: because Wiz also sees the running cloud, it traces production risk to its root in code and prioritises code findings by real cloud reachability. From Wiz (founded Jan 2020, Israel; now a Google/Alphabet subsidiary after the ~$32B acquisition closed March 2026). The honest framing — real differentiator, and where specialists win: Wiz Code’s genuine differentiator is code-to-cloud correlation — no pure AppSec tool has the running-cloud context — and it’s highly compelling WHEN you run Wiz Cloud (the correlation is the point). But be honest: as a STANDALONE AppSec tool, the specialists are stronger. (1) Snyk is MORE MATURE and MORE DEVELOPER-LOVED — deeper SCA, broader language and IDE support, a bigger developer ecosystem. If you want the best pure developer AppSec, Snyk. (2) Aqua Security (and open-source Trivy) are VERY STRONG for CONTAINERS specifically. (3) GitHub Advanced Security is natural if you’re all-GitHub; Endor Labs is a strong modern SCA/reachability challenger. So the honest read: Wiz Code is a weaker choice as a FIRST, standalone AppSec buy, and a compelling one as an EXTENSION of Wiz Cloud. And Wiz is PREMIUM and quote-only. So the honest positioning: for shift-left with code-to-cloud correlation (especially if you run Wiz Cloud), Wiz Code leads on context; for the deepest standalone developer AppSec, Snyk; for containers, Aqua/Trivy; for all-GitHub, GitHub Advanced Security. TechBag scopes Wiz Code honestly — comparing the specialists — and licenses and supports it locally with GST.
The numbers behind the platform
What your Wiz Code journey looks like
Scoping (& the specialists)
Your repos, CI/CD, IaC (Terraform?), containers — and whether you run Wiz Cloud (the source of code-to-cloud correlation). TechBag scopes it and compares honestly vs Snyk (deepest standalone AppSec), Aqua/Trivy (containers) and GitHub Advanced Security — and flags that Wiz Code is most compelling as an extension of Wiz Cloud.
Connect repos & pipelines
Connect Wiz Code to your repos, CI/CD and registries — and it scans IaC, code/dependencies (SCA), secrets, pipelines and container images, surfacing findings in the IDE and PR. Shift-left coverage, fast.
Correlate & prioritise
Because Wiz sees your running cloud, Wiz Code traces production risk to its root in code and ranks code findings by real cloud reachability — so developers fix what actually creates production risk, via 1-click fix PRs. Close the loop.
Guardrail & extend
Set policy-as-code guardrails to block risky changes pre-deploy, and correlate with CSPM, CIEM, DSPM and Wiz Defend on one graph — build to run. TechBag supports you locally (marketplace draw-down, GST).
Trusted across regulated industries in 100+ countries
The review scoreboard
Modelled on Gartner Peer Insights structure. *Counts and breakdowns are illustrative pending verified review collection.
Quick poll — what’s driving your evaluation?
Talk to an advisor“Code-to-cloud is the killer feature — we can trace an exposed production resource back to the exact Terraform block that created it, and fix the root cause. Nothing standalone does that.”
“Because Wiz Code knows what’s actually running, our developers only see the findings that map to real cloud risk — not every theoretical CVE. Alert fatigue on the dev side dropped hard.”
“1-click fix PRs got developer buy-in — remediation is a merge, not a ticket. Security in the PR, where they already are, was the difference.”
“Honest: we still use Snyk for deep SCA and IDE support — it’s more developer-loved standalone. We run Wiz Code for the code-to-cloud correlation because we’re on Wiz Cloud. TechBag was clear about the split.”
“It only made sense because we already run Wiz Cloud — that’s where the correlation comes from. TechBag was honest that as a first standalone AppSec buy, a specialist might fit better.”
“Shift-left with guardrails stopped whole classes of misconfig from ever deploying — we fix the IaC once and every future deploy inherits it. The treadmill of production fixes eased.”
“Closing the loop from build to run on one graph — the same risk visible in code, cloud and runtime — finally got our AppSec and cloud-security teams working from the same data.”
“Premium and quote-only, strongest with the Wiz CNAPP. TechBag scoped the repos and pipelines, compared vs Snyk/Aqua honestly, drew it down against cloud spend, and added INR/GST.”
Where everyone sits — the grids
Analyst firms bury this view behind paywalls, and G2 retired its Grid. So here’s TechBag’s synthesis of the shift-left / AppSec (ASPM) market — tap any vendor to see why it sits where it does.
TechBag Email-Security Grid
Execution strength vs product vision — the classic market map, minus the paywall.
Shift-left in the CNAPP graph. This page's product.
Detection × Portfolio Integration
The grid nobody publishes — how strong the email detection is vs how integrated with the wider security portfolio.
Code-to-cloud correlation depth.
Positions are TechBag’s illustrative synthesis of public review-platform data and vendor documentation — not a reproduction of any analyst graphic. Verify before relying on it.
Wiz Code vs the shift-left / AppSec field
Snyk, Aqua/Trivy, Prisma (Bridgecrew), GitHub Advanced Security and Endor Labs — honest lanes; Wiz’s edge is code-to-cloud correlation. Want the deepest standalone developer AppSec first? Snyk. Container-heavy? Aqua/Trivy. All-GitHub? GHAS. We say so.
| Dimension | Wiz | Snyk | Prisma Cloud (Bridgecrew) | Aqua (Trivy) | GitHub Advanced Security | Endor Labs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Position | Shift-left in the CNAPP graph | Developer AppSec leader | IaC/AppSec in Prisma | Container/OSS security | Native GitHub AppSec | Modern SCA/reachability |
| Code-to-cloud correlation | Best-in-class (Security Graph) | Limited (code-focused) | Some (in Prisma) | Some | Code-only | Reachability-focused |
| Standalone developer AppSec / SCA | Good (in-suite) | Deepest, most-loved | Good (Bridgecrew) | Good (OSS-strong) | Good (GitHub) | Strong SCA/reachability |
| Container security | Good | Good | Good | Very strong (Trivy) | Basic | Some |
| Price / value | Premium (quote-only) | Mid/premium | Premium (Prisma) | Trivy is free/OSS | Bundled w/ GitHub | Mid |
| Best fit | Shift-left correlated to your running cloud (with Wiz Cloud) | Deepest, most developer-loved AppSec | IaC/AppSec inside Prisma Cloud | Container & OSS security | All-GitHub AppSec | Modern SCA & reachability |
Which email-security approach fits you?
Honest fit signals — because the fastest way to lose your trust is to pretend one product wins every scenario.
Choose Wiz Code if…
- ✓You already run (or want) Wiz Cloud — the code-to-cloud correlation is the point
- ✓You want to trace production risk to its root in code, and prioritise code by real cloud reachability
- ✓You want shift-left scanning (IaC, SCA, secrets, pipelines, images) with 1-click fix PRs in developers’ tools
- ✓You want build-to-run on one Security Graph — with TechBag adding GST
Snyk if…
- ✓You want the DEEPEST, most developer-loved standalone AppSec — deeper SCA, broader language/IDE support, bigger ecosystem
Aqua (Trivy) if…
- ✓You want CONTAINER and open-source security specifically (Trivy is free/OSS)
GitHub Advanced Security if…
- ✓You’re ALL-GITHUB and want native, bundled AppSec
Endor Labs if…
- ✓You want a modern SCA / reachability-focused challenger
What do email threats cost you?
Drag the sliders (developers; findings per month; developer/analyst hour cost as loaded rate). Estimates contrast code-only scanners (every theoretical finding, no cloud context, fixes in production, separate portal) vs Wiz Code (shift-left pre-deploy, code-to-cloud correlation so you fix only what maps to real cloud risk, 1-click fix PRs, guardrails) — the wins are developer time saved, production incidents avoided by fixing at the source, and rework eliminated. Illustrative — TechBag scopes your pipelines.
Loaded cost = salary + overheads per productive hour. Illustrative only — your TechBag quote models actual device counts and modules.
Three ways to consume it
Wiz is premium & quote-only (no public list); Wiz Code is typically part of the Wiz CNAPP subscription (strongest run alongside Wiz Cloud — the source of code-to-cloud correlation). Marketplace anchors for the platform are ~$24k/yr (Essential) and ~$38k/yr (Advanced) for 100 workloads; real deals $100k–300k+. Treat as indicative. Wiz’s motion is cloud marketplaces — draw it down against committed cloud spend; TechBag scopes it and handles INR/GST.
Wiz Code (by quote / with CNAPP)
Best for shift-left + code-to-cloud
- Scan IaC, code/SCA, secrets, pipelines & container images pre-deploy
- Code-to-cloud correlation — trace production risk to its root in code
- 1-click fix PRs in the tools developers already use
+ Platform add-ons
Best for a broader rollout
- Scoped to your estate
- Add-on modules as needed
- Phased, right-sized deployment
+ scoping & local support
Best value with TechBag
- Repo/pipeline scoping + honest Snyk/Aqua/GHAS comparison + neutrality read
- Most compelling with Wiz Cloud; premium & quote-only; draw down cloud spend
- TechBag adds INR/GST & local support
Buy it for less — TechBag pricing beats list
Whatever the list prices above, TechBag negotiates a significantly better deal — with GST-compliant INR invoicing and local support. Ask us for your discounted quote.
Get an India-ready quote
Tell us your device counts and current tools — we’ll model it against what you spend today.
The 8 questions to ask every vendor
Take this into your next vendor call — including ours.
Can’t trace a production risk back to its code? Wiz Code links code to cloud both ways — fix the root cause.
Fixing the same misconfig in production repeatedly? Wiz Code catches it in the IaC/pipeline, pre-deploy, with guardrails.
Developers drowning in findings? Wiz Code prioritises by real cloud reachability — only what matters, with 1-click fix PRs.
Already on Wiz CSPM/CNAPP? Wiz Code is highly compelling — the code-to-cloud correlation is the point.
Want the deepest developer AppSec (first, standalone)? Snyk is more mature/loved — TechBag compares honestly.
Container-heavy? Aqua/Trivy are very strong (Trivy is free/OSS) — TechBag advises where each fits.
All-GitHub? GitHub Advanced Security is native and bundled — TechBag compares.
Wiz is premium & quote-only (strongest with the CNAPP) — TechBag scopes it, draws down cloud spend, and adds INR/GST.
Questions buyers ask
Ready to close the code-to-cloud loop?
Scope Wiz Code (shift-left scanning of IaC, code, secrets, pipelines and container images, with code-to-cloud correlation that traces production risk to its root in code) — and let a TechBag advisor scope the repos and pipelines, compare honestly vs Snyk, Aqua/Trivy and GitHub Advanced Security, give the honest Google-ownership neutrality read, and add INR/GST and local support.
Stats, ratings, review counts and pricing are illustrative and sourced from public materials; verify before purchase.