- BFSIBanking, Financial Services & Insurance
- HealthcareComing soon
- ManufacturingComing soon
- Retail & E-CommerceComing soon
Mitigata VAPT
Secure the front door. Email is where most attacks arrive — Mitigata VAPT is CERT-In-empanelled pen testing & offensive security — find and prove your weaknesses before attackers do, with reports accepted by Indian regulators — and, distinctively, findings that feed your live SOC so they get fixed, not filed.
Buy through TechBag
Same software. Better outcome — at no extra cost.
Free, vendor-neutral, 30 minutes
How it’s rated
Full scoreboard ↓Quick answer
Mitigata VAPT is CERT-In-empanelled Vulnerability Assessment and Penetration Testing — finding the weaknesses in your systems, applications and infrastructure before attackers do — from India's full-stack cyber resilience company, with the crucial advantage that its reports are accepted by Indian regulators and its findings feed your live security, compliance and insurance. Here's what it does and why it matters: you can't fix weaknesses you don't know about, and attackers are actively probing for them — so you need to find and fix your vulnerabilities before they're exploited. VAPT does exactly this: vulnerability assessment systematically identifies weaknesses across your attack surface (applications, networks, cloud, APIs, infrastructure), and penetration testing goes further, with skilled testers actively attempting to exploit them (like a real attacker would) to prove what's genuinely exploitable and how far an attacker could get. Mitigata's VAPT is CERT-In-empanelled — a critical advantage in India, because it means its reports are accepted by Indian regulators including RBI, SEBI, IRDAI and DPDP authorities, so the testing directly satisfies Indian regulatory requirements (many of which mandate periodic VAPT by an empanelled tester). Beyond standard VAPT, Mitigata offers the full offensive-security range: DAST/SAST (application security testing), red, blue and purple teaming, bug bounty, and AI red-teaming for AI systems. And distinctively, because Mitigata runs your whole resilience stack, VAPT findings don't sit in a PDF that's ignored — they feed your live security operations (the SOC prioritises and helps remediate them), your compliance evidence, and your security-linked insurance posture. The result is CERT-In-accredited, regulator-accepted VAPT whose findings actually get acted on — not a compliance-checkbox report that gathers dust. TechBag scopes, deploys and quotes it in INR/GST.
The Mitigata cyber-resilience stack
This page covers VAPT — offensive security. The rest of the stack:
Quick facts
30-second orientation- Product
- Mitigata VAPT — CERT-In pen testing & offensive security
- Vendor
- Mitigata (Bengaluru, India · founded 2023)
- The accreditation
- CERT-In-empanelled (regulator-accepted)
- Accepted by
- RBI, SEBI, IRDAI, DPDP authorities
- VA
- Systematic weakness identification
- PT
- Skilled testers actively exploit (like attackers)
- The range
- DAST/SAST, red/blue/purple team, bug bounty, AI red-team
- The differentiator
- Findings feed live security, compliance, insurance
- vs a PDF
- Findings acted on, not filed and forgotten
- In India via
- TechBag — scoping, quotes, GST invoicing, support
Understand email security before you buy it
Most product pages skip this. We start here — so you buy a capability, not a buzzword.
What is Mitigata VAPT?
CERT-In-empanelled pen testing & offensive security — find and prove your weaknesses before attackers do, regulator-accepted.
Unprotected inbox vs AI email security — the honest table
What consolidation actually replaces, dimension by dimension.
| Dimension | Unprotected / signature email | Mitigata VAPT (Mitigata) |
|---|---|---|
| Knowing your weaknesses | Unknown until breached | Found by VA + PT first |
| Vulnerability list | Theoretical, hundreds | Proven exploitable, prioritised |
| Regulator acceptance | Maybe (non-empanelled) | CERT-In-accepted |
| What happens to findings | Filed in a PDF, ignored | Fed to SOC, remediated |
| Offensive range | Juggle boutiques | VAPT to red-team to AI, one provider |
| Compliance evidence | Separate work | VAPT feeds GRC directly |
| Insurance | Unrelated | Remediation improves cover |
| Cadence | Once-a-year snapshot | Retest + continuous |
You can't fix what you don't know — and attackers are probing for it. Mitigata VAPT is CERT-In-accredited (regulator-accepted) and, distinctively, findings feed your live SOC so they get fixed, not filed in a PDF.
The five pieces of the platform
Vendors love diagrams; buyers need to know what they’re actually operating. Here’s the whole platform, demystified.
Vulnerability Assessment
Systematically identifies weaknesses across your attack surface — applications, networks, cloud, APIs, infrastructure — so you know where you're vulnerable, comprehensively.
Penetration Testing
Skilled testers actively attempt to exploit the weaknesses, like a real attacker — proving what's genuinely exploitable and how far an attacker could get, not just a theoretical list.
CERT-In Empanelment
As a CERT-In-empanelled tester, Mitigata's reports are accepted by Indian regulators (RBI, SEBI, IRDAI, DPDP) — so the testing directly satisfies Indian regulatory VAPT mandates.
Full Offensive Range
DAST/SAST application testing, red/blue/purple teaming, bug bounty and AI red-teaming — the full offensive-security range, matched to your risk and maturity.
Findings → Live Stack
Findings feed your live security (the SOC prioritises and helps remediate), your compliance evidence, and your insurance posture — so they get acted on, not filed in an ignored PDF.
One agent on every machine, one console over all of them — modules attach without a second operational world.
The full offensive range, CERT-In-accredited
Mitigata tests everything an attacker could reach — and the findings feed your live stack, not a filed PDF. What’s covered:
Core testing
- VAPT
- Vulnerability Assessment
- Penetration Testing
- Attack Surface Monitoring
Application security
- DAST / SAST
- API testing
- Web & mobile app testing
Adversary simulation
- Red Teaming
- Blue Teaming
- Purple Teaming
- Bug Bounty
AI security
- AI Red-Teaming
- AI / Prompt Security
- AI Risk Reviews
- AI Tabletop Exercises
Accreditation
- CERT-In-empanelled
- Accepted by RBI/SEBI/IRDAI/DPDP
- Regulator-ready reports
Acted on
- Findings → live SOC
- → compliance evidence
- → insurance posture
- Retest & confirm
One accountable partner — not a dozen point vendors. TechBag scopes exactly what you need in INR/GST.
Twelve capabilities. Assess, exploit, act.
Find and fix your weaknesses before attackers do — CERT-In-accredited, and actually acted on — part of the portfolio, and paired with the human firewall.
Vulnerability Assessment
Systematically identify weaknesses across applications, networks, cloud, APIs and infrastructure — comprehensive coverage of your attack surface, so nothing exploitable hides unknown.
DAST / SAST
Dynamic and static application security testing — finding vulnerabilities in your applications both at rest (code) and running — because applications are a leading attack vector.
Attack-Surface Coverage
Test your whole external and internal attack surface — the assets, apps and entry points an attacker could reach — so testing reflects your real exposure, not just a chosen slice.
CERT-In-Empanelled
As a CERT-In-empanelled tester, reports are accepted by Indian regulators (RBI, SEBI, IRDAI, DPDP) — directly satisfying the Indian regulatory VAPT mandates many organisations must meet.
Penetration Testing
Skilled testers actively attempt to exploit weaknesses like a real attacker — proving what's genuinely exploitable and the real-world impact, far beyond a theoretical vulnerability list.
Red / Blue / Purple Teaming
Full adversary simulation — red team (attack), blue team (defend), purple team (collaborate) — testing not just your systems but your detection and response, end to end.
Bug Bounty
Run managed bug-bounty programmes — harnessing a crowd of ethical researchers to find vulnerabilities continuously, complementing point-in-time testing.
AI Red-Teaming
Test AI systems for AI-specific risks (prompt injection, model manipulation) — offensive security for the AI you're adopting, an emerging and important frontier.
SOC-Prioritised Remediation
Distinctively, findings feed your live SOC — which prioritises them by real risk and helps drive remediation — so the report becomes action, not a list nobody acts on.
Feeds Compliance Evidence
CERT-In VAPT reports feed your compliance/GRC directly — providing the regulator-accepted technical evidence that DPDP, SEBI, RBI and ISO/SOC 2 audits require.
Feeds Insurance Posture
Findings (and their remediation) feed your security-linked insurance posture — because Mitigata prices cover on real security, fixing what VAPT finds can improve your terms.
Retest & Continuous
Retest after remediation to confirm fixes, and — via attack-surface monitoring — move toward continuous testing rather than a once-a-year snapshot that goes stale.
Watch Mitigata VAPT in action
The overview, getting started, and protecting M365 email.
Mitigata: A New Era of Cyber Insurance & Security
Offensive security, connected to the whole stack.
Want a live, India-context walkthrough on your own fleet?
Book a guided demo →The endpoint catches what arrives. Email stops it arriving.
Here’s what genuinely sets Mitigata VAPT apart.
You can't fix what you don't know — VAPT finds it before attackers do
The fundamental reason Mitigata VAPT exists is simple and vital: you cannot fix weaknesses you don't know about, attackers are actively probing for them, so you must find and fix your vulnerabilities before they're exploited — and VAPT is how you do that systematically and provably. Consider the asymmetry you face. Your systems, applications and infrastructure inevitably have vulnerabilities — misconfigurations, unpatched flaws, insecure code, exposed services, weak access controls. These accumulate as your environment grows and changes. And attackers are actively, continuously probing for them — scanning the internet, testing your applications, looking for the way in. If you don't know your own weaknesses, you can't fix them, and you're relying on luck that attackers don't find them first — a losing bet, because attackers are systematic and persistent. So you need to find your vulnerabilities before attackers exploit them, and fix them. VAPT does exactly this, in two complementary ways. Vulnerability assessment systematically identifies your weaknesses across your whole attack surface — applications, networks, cloud, APIs, infrastructure — giving you a comprehensive picture of where you're vulnerable. Penetration testing goes further: skilled human testers actively attempt to exploit those weaknesses, exactly as a real attacker would — proving what's genuinely exploitable (not just theoretically flagged), how the vulnerabilities chain together, and how far an attacker could actually get. This distinction matters: a vulnerability scan produces a long list of theoretical issues, many low-risk; penetration testing proves which are genuinely dangerous and demonstrates real impact — so you can prioritise fixing what actually matters. Together, VA (find comprehensively) and PT (prove what's exploitable) give you an accurate, actionable picture of your real security weaknesses — so you can fix them before attackers exploit them. This is a foundational security practice: knowing and fixing your own weaknesses, proactively, rather than discovering them when you're breached. For any organisation with systems worth protecting (all of them), finding and fixing vulnerabilities before attackers do is essential, and VAPT is how. TechBag helps organisations find and fix their weaknesses with Mitigata VAPT.
CERT-In-empanelled — regulator-accepted VAPT that satisfies Indian mandates
A critical advantage of Mitigata VAPT for Indian organisations is that it's CERT-In-empanelled — which means its reports are accepted by Indian regulators, so the testing directly satisfies the Indian regulatory VAPT mandates that many organisations are legally required to meet. This matters enormously in the Indian context. CERT-In (the Indian Computer Emergency Response Team) empanels security auditing organisations, and many Indian regulations require organisations to undergo periodic VAPT specifically by a CERT-In-empanelled tester. The RBI mandates VAPT for banks and financial institutions. SEBI's framework requires it for regulated entities. IRDAI requires it for insurers. And various DPDP, sector and government requirements mandate CERT-In-accredited security testing. So for regulated Indian organisations, VAPT isn't optional — it's a legal requirement, and crucially, it must be done by a CERT-In-empanelled tester for the report to be accepted. This is exactly where Mitigata's CERT-In empanelment is decisive: because Mitigata is CERT-In-empanelled, its VAPT reports are accepted by these Indian regulators (RBI, SEBI, IRDAI, DPDP authorities) — so its testing directly satisfies your Indian regulatory VAPT obligations. If you used a non-empanelled tester, the report might not be accepted by your regulator, meaning you'd fail to meet the mandate despite having done testing. So CERT-In empanelment isn't a nice-to-have — for regulated Indian organisations, it's a requirement, and Mitigata has it. This gives Indian organisations confidence that the VAPT they get from Mitigata will actually satisfy their regulatory obligations — a critical practical advantage over testers who lack the empanelment. And it reflects Mitigata's India-native positioning: built for the Indian regulatory reality, accredited by the Indian authority, so its security testing meets Indian requirements out of the box. For any regulated Indian organisation with a VAPT mandate (banks, NBFCs, insurers, SEBI entities, and increasingly many others under DPDP and sector rules), CERT-In-empanelled testing is essential, and Mitigata provides it. TechBag helps regulated Indian organisations meet their VAPT mandates with CERT-In-empanelled Mitigata VAPT. The honest scope follows.
Findings that get acted on — not a PDF that gathers dust
The most distinctive value of Mitigata VAPT is what happens to the findings: because Mitigata runs your whole resilience stack, VAPT findings feed your live security, compliance and insurance — so they actually get acted on, rather than sitting in a PDF report that gathers dust, which is the fate of most VAPT. Consider the dirty secret of a lot of VAPT: the report gets filed and largely ignored. An organisation commissions a VAPT (often just to satisfy a compliance checkbox), receives a long PDF report full of findings, and then... struggles to act on it. The findings are a list disconnected from the organisation's actual security operations; there's no one clearly responsible for remediation; the security team (if there is one) is overstretched; and the report becomes a compliance artifact that's filed away, with many findings never fixed — so the vulnerabilities the VAPT found remain exploitable. This is a huge waste: the testing found the weaknesses, but the weaknesses don't get fixed, so the whole point (reducing risk) is lost. It's testing as a checkbox, not as risk reduction. Mitigata is different because VAPT is part of its unified stack, so the findings don't sit isolated in a PDF — they feed the live operations. Feed the SOC: the findings go to Mitigata's live security operations, which prioritise them by real risk (using the live context of your environment) and help drive remediation — so someone accountable is acting on them, not leaving them in a report. Feed compliance: the CERT-In VAPT reports feed your compliance/GRC directly, providing regulator-accepted evidence. Feed insurance: the findings (and their remediation) feed your security-linked insurance posture — so fixing what VAPT finds can improve your cover terms, giving a direct incentive to actually remediate. So instead of testing → PDF → ignored, it's testing → live prioritisation and remediation → improved compliance and insurance. The findings become action and risk reduction, which is the entire point of VAPT. This connection — VAPT feeding the live stack rather than a dead report — is a genuine differentiator and addresses the biggest failure mode of traditional VAPT. For organisations that want VAPT to actually reduce their risk (not just tick a box), this acted-on model is decisive. TechBag helps organisations get VAPT that's acted on with Mitigata. The honest scope follows.
The full offensive range — from VAPT to red teaming to AI
Beyond standard VAPT, Mitigata offers the full offensive-security range — DAST/SAST, red/blue/purple teaming, bug bounty, and AI red-teaming — so you can match the depth of offensive testing to your risk and maturity, from a single accredited provider. Consider the spectrum of offensive security. Standard VAPT (vulnerability assessment and penetration testing) is the foundation — finding and proving weaknesses. But mature security programmes need more. Application security testing (DAST/SAST): dynamic and static testing of your applications specifically, because applications are a leading attack vector and need dedicated code-and-runtime testing. Red/blue/purple teaming: full adversary simulation — a red team attacks like a real, determined adversary (testing not just whether vulnerabilities exist but whether your defences detect and stop an attack), a blue team defends, and a purple team has them collaborate to improve — testing your whole detection-and-response capability, not just your systems. Bug bounty: harnessing a crowd of ethical researchers to find vulnerabilities continuously, complementing point-in-time testing. And AI red-teaming: testing AI systems for AI-specific risks (prompt injection, model manipulation) — an emerging, important frontier as organisations adopt AI. Mitigata offers this whole range, which is valuable for several reasons. Matched depth: you can choose the right level for your risk and maturity — standard VAPT for a straightforward need, up to full red-teaming for a mature programme that wants to test its defences, and AI red-teaming as you adopt AI. Single accredited provider: getting the whole range from one CERT-In-empanelled provider (rather than juggling separate boutiques for pen testing, app testing, red teaming and AI) means consistency, one relationship, and findings that all feed the same live stack. Progression: as your security matures, you can progress up the offensive-security spectrum with the same provider. So Mitigata isn't just a basic VAPT vendor — it's a full offensive-security provider covering the whole spectrum from vulnerability assessment to red teaming to AI red-teaming, accredited and connected to the live stack. For organisations wanting offensive security matched to their maturity from one accredited, connected provider, this range is compelling. TechBag helps organisations get the right offensive-security depth with Mitigata. The honest scope follows.
India-native, CERT-In-accredited, and part of one accountable stack
Mitigata VAPT's advantages come together in its India-native, CERT-In-accredited, connected-stack positioning: it's built for the Indian regulatory reality, accredited by the Indian authority, and part of one accountable cyber-resilience stack rather than an isolated testing engagement. On India-native and CERT-In-accredited: as covered, Mitigata's CERT-In empanelment means its reports are accepted by Indian regulators, directly satisfying the VAPT mandates Indian organisations face — a critical, India-specific advantage. And as an India-native company, it understands the Indian regulatory context (which frameworks require what testing, how reports must be formatted for Indian regulators) and provides local handling and support. On being part of one accountable stack: unlike an isolated VAPT engagement from a boutique that tests, delivers a PDF, and departs, Mitigata's VAPT is part of its unified stack — so, as covered, the findings feed your live security (prioritised and remediated by the SOC), your compliance (regulator-accepted evidence), and your insurance (improving your posture-priced cover). This means VAPT isn't a disconnected one-off but part of your ongoing, accountable cyber resilience — one partner accountable for finding your weaknesses, helping fix them, keeping you compliant, and getting you covered. This connection and accountability is a real advantage over commissioning isolated VAPT engagements that produce reports nobody acts on. So Mitigata VAPT offers CERT-In-accredited, regulator-accepted, India-native offensive security whose findings actually get acted on because it's part of one accountable resilience stack — a combination especially valuable for Indian organisations that must meet VAPT mandates and want the testing to genuinely reduce their risk, not just produce a filed report. TechBag proudly represents this India-native, connected offensive-security capability. The honest scope follows.
The honest scope
Mitigata VAPT is CERT-In-empanelled Vulnerability Assessment and Penetration Testing plus the full offensive-security range (DAST/SAST, red/blue/purple teaming, bug bounty, AI red-teaming) — regulator-accepted (RBI, SEBI, IRDAI, DPDP), India-native, and distinctively part of a unified stack so findings feed your live security, compliance and insurance rather than sitting in an ignored PDF. The honest framing: VAPT and offensive security is a well-established field with many capable providers — dedicated pen-testing and offensive-security boutiques and firms (in India and globally), some with very deep, specialised expertise in particular areas (elite red teams, niche application-security specialists, specialised AI-security firms). For the very deepest, most specialised offensive engagement in a specific niche, an elite boutique may go deeper than Mitigata's team. Mitigata's distinctive edge is not necessarily being the single deepest pen-test boutique, but combining CERT-In accreditation (regulator-accepted, satisfying Indian mandates), the full offensive range from one provider, India-native regulatory fit, and — most distinctively — findings that feed the live security/compliance/insurance stack so they actually get acted on (addressing the biggest failure of traditional VAPT: reports that gather dust). It's most compelling for Indian organisations that must meet CERT-In VAPT mandates and want testing that genuinely reduces risk (acted-on findings) as part of their whole cyber resilience, rather than an isolated compliance-checkbox report. For the deepest specialised offensive engagement in a specific niche, an elite boutique may complement it. TechBag scopes Mitigata VAPT honestly and quotes it in INR/GST.
The numbers behind the platform
What your VAPT journey looks like
Scope & mandate check
Your attack surface, your regulatory VAPT mandate (RBI/SEBI/IRDAI/DPDP), and the offensive depth you need. TechBag scopes it free.
Assess & exploit
Vulnerability assessment across your attack surface, then penetration testing to prove what's genuinely exploitable — CERT-In-empanelled, regulator-accepted.
Act on findings
Findings feed the live SOC (prioritised, remediated), your compliance evidence, and your insurance posture — not a filed PDF. Retest to confirm fixes.
Continuous assurance
Retesting and attack-surface monitoring move you toward continuous assurance, connected to your whole resilience. TechBag models it in INR/GST.
Trusted across regulated industries in 100+ countries
The review scoreboard
Modelled on Gartner Peer Insights structure. *Counts and breakdowns are illustrative pending verified review collection.
Quick poll — what’s driving your evaluation?
Talk to an advisor“CERT-In empanelment was non-negotiable for us — as an RBI-regulated entity, our VAPT reports must be accepted by the regulator. Mitigata's empanelled testing satisfied the mandate directly.”
“Unlike every past VAPT that ended in a PDF nobody acted on, Mitigata's findings fed their SOC — which prioritised and helped us remediate. The vulnerabilities actually got fixed. That's the whole point.”
“Penetration testing proved which of our vulnerabilities were genuinely exploitable — not a theoretical list of hundreds, but the handful that actually mattered, demonstrated. We fixed the right things.”
“Getting standard VAPT, application testing AND red teaming from one CERT-In-accredited provider — instead of juggling boutiques — meant consistency and findings that all fed the same stack.”
“The VAPT report fed our compliance evidence directly — regulator-accepted, satisfying our SEBI and DPDP obligations. Testing and compliance working together, not separately.”
“As we adopted AI, their AI red-teaming tested for prompt-injection and model risks our standard testing wouldn't cover. Offensive security for the AI frontier, from the same provider.”
“That fixing what VAPT found improved our security-linked insurance terms gave us a direct incentive to remediate — testing that pays off twice. TechBag scoped the engagement.”
“Retesting after remediation confirmed our fixes actually worked — closing the loop, not just handing us a list. Proper, thorough testing.”
Where everyone sits — the grids
Analyst firms bury this view behind paywalls, and G2 retired its Grid. So here’s TechBag’s synthesis of the email security market — tap any vendor to see why it sits where it does.
TechBag Email-Security Grid
Execution strength vs product vision — the classic market map, minus the paywall.
CERT-In VAPT, acted-on findings, in a unified stack. This page's product.
Detection × Portfolio Integration
The grid nobody publishes — how strong the email detection is vs how integrated with the wider security portfolio.
CERT-In + full range + acted-on + connected.
Positions are TechBag’s illustrative synthesis of public review-platform data and vendor documentation — not a reproduction of any analyst graphic. Verify before relying on it.
Mitigata VAPT vs the offensive-security field
Pen-test boutiques, scanners, Big-4 and no-testing — honest lanes; the edge is CERT-In accreditation, the full offensive range, and findings that feed the live stack (acted on, not filed).
| Dimension | Mitigata VAPT | Pen-test boutique | Automated scanner only | Big-4 / consultancy | No testing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Position | CERT-In VAPT in a unified stack | Specialist offensive firm | Tool-based scanning | Broad advisory + testing | The gap |
| CERT-In-empanelled (regulator-accepted) | Yes — RBI/SEBI/IRDAI/DPDP | Some are | No | Some are | N/A |
| Real penetration testing (not just scan) | Skilled human exploitation | Deep (their core) | Automated only | Yes, varies | No |
| Full offensive range (DAST/SAST, red team, AI) | Yes, one provider | Their specialisms | No | Some | No |
| Findings ACTED ON (feed live SOC) | Yes — SOC prioritises & remediates | PDF, then you act alone | A list, no action | Report + advice | N/A |
| Feeds compliance evidence | Directly to GRC | Report you submit | No | Report | No |
| Feeds insurance posture | Yes — remediation → better cover | No | No | No | No |
| Retest & continuous | Retest + attack-surface monitoring | Retest (extra cost) | Continuous scan (shallow) | Periodic | None |
| India-native regulatory fit | Built for Indian mandates | Varies | Generic tool | Advisory-aware | N/A |
| Best fit | Indian orgs needing CERT-In VAPT that's acted on, in one stack | Deepest specialised offensive engagement | Cheap surface scanning only | Broad advisory + testing (at cost) | Nobody — untested = unknown weaknesses |
Which email-security approach fits you?
Honest fit signals — because the fastest way to lose your trust is to pretend one product wins every scenario.
Choose Mitigata VAPT if…
- ✓You need CERT-In-empanelled VAPT accepted by Indian regulators (RBI/SEBI/IRDAI/DPDP)
- ✓You want findings ACTED ON (fed to the SOC), not filed in an ignored PDF
- ✓You want the full offensive range (VAPT, DAST/SAST, red team, AI) from one provider
- ✓You want testing connected to your compliance and insurance, India-native
Pen-test boutique if…
- ✓You need the deepest specialised offensive engagement in a specific niche
Automated scanner only if…
- ✓You want cheap surface scanning (but no proven exploitability or human depth)
Big-4 / consultancy if…
- ✓You want broad advisory plus testing and can absorb the cost
No testing if…
- ✓Never — untested systems have unknown weaknesses attackers will find first
What do email threats cost you?
Drag the sliders (count users; IT-hour cost as loaded incident rate). Estimates assume ~1.5 hours per user per year handling email threats that reach the inbox without AI filtering, with ~70% removed by stopping the mass at the gateway — the avoided-breach value (most attacks start here) is the larger, unpriced win. Illustrative.
Loaded cost = salary + overheads per productive hour. Illustrative only — your TechBag quote models actual device counts and modules.
Three ways to consume it
Mitigata VAPT is scoped per engagement — by what's tested, the depth (standard VAPT to red team to AI), and cadence — often within Gordon so findings feed your live stack. Satisfies CERT-In mandates. TechBag scopes it and quotes in INR/GST.
VAPT (CERT-In)
Best for offensive testing
- Quote-based — scoped to your attack surface & depth
- CERT-In-empanelled — accepted by RBI/SEBI/IRDAI/DPDP
- Findings feed the live SOC — fixed, not filed
+ Platform add-ons
Best for a broader rollout
- Scoped to your estate
- Add-on modules as needed
- Phased, right-sized deployment
+ The stack
Best complete
- Findings → compliance evidence & insurance
- Full range: VAPT to red-team to AI, one provider
- TechBag scopes the mix
Buy it for less — TechBag pricing beats list
Whatever the list prices above, TechBag negotiates a significantly better deal — with GST-compliant INR invoicing and local support. Ask us for your discounted quote.
Get an India-ready quote
Tell us your device counts and current tools — we’ll model it against what you spend today.
The 8 questions to ask every vendor
Take this into your next vendor call — including ours.
Confirm your regulatory VAPT mandate (RBI/SEBI/IRDAI/DPDP) needs CERT-In-empanelled testing.
Scope your attack surface — apps, networks, cloud, APIs, infrastructure — for comprehensive testing.
Get both vulnerability assessment (find) and penetration testing (prove exploitability).
Match depth to maturity — DAST/SAST, red team, AI red-team as needed.
Ensure findings feed the live SOC for prioritised remediation — not a filed PDF.
Confirm CERT-In reports feed your compliance evidence.
Link remediation to your security-linked insurance posture.
Retest after fixes and move toward continuous — TechBag scopes it and quotes in INR/GST.
Questions buyers ask
Ready to find your weaknesses before attackers do?
Scope Mitigata VAPT (CERT-In-empanelled testing accepted by Indian regulators, the full offensive range, findings that feed your live SOC and get fixed), meet your VAPT mandate, or let a TechBag advisor plan your offensive security.
Stats, ratings, review counts and pricing are illustrative and sourced from public materials; verify before purchase.