Secure the front door. Email is where most attacks arrive — Log Management centralises all your logs in one searchable place, correlated with metrics & traces — with the signature ‘Logging without Limits’: ingest everything cheaply, index only what you search. Logs solved — including the biggest problem, cost.
Buy through TechBag
Same software. Better outcome — at no extra cost.
Free, vendor-neutral, 30 minutes
How it’s rated
Full scoreboard ↓Quick answer
This page covers Log Management — centralised logs. The rest of the Datadog platform:
Most product pages skip this. We start here — so you buy a capability, not a buzzword.
Datadog’s centralised log management — all your logs in one searchable place, correlated with metrics & traces, with the signature ‘Logging without Limits’ cost model (ingest all cheaply, index selectively).
What consolidation actually replaces, dimension by dimension.
| Dimension | Unprotected / signature email | Log Management (Datadog) |
|---|---|---|
| Logs | Scattered across systems | Centralised, searchable |
| The cost dilemma | Log everything (₹₹₹) or little (blind) | Ingest all, index selectively |
| Search | Slow / per-system | Fast full-text, analytics |
| Context | Logs in isolation | Log → trace → infra, 1 click |
| Volume control | None | Observability Pipelines (reduce cost) |
| PII | Leaked into logs | Scanned & redacted |
| Retention | All or nothing (costly) | Tiered + cheap archives |
| Cost | Balloons | Per-GB/indexed — managed |
Datadog centralises & correlates your logs (log → trace → infra, one click), with 'Logging without Limits' (ingest all, index selectively). Honest caveat: logs are the #1 Datadog cost surprise — managing volume/indexing is essential. Cheapest OSS? Elastic/Loki. Deepest SIEM? Splunk. TechBag manages the cost + GST.
Vendors love diagrams; buyers need to know what they’re actually operating. Here’s the whole platform, demystified.
Collect and centralise logs from across all your systems and applications — servers, containers, cloud services, applications, network devices — into one place. So instead of logs scattered across many systems (hard to access and correlate), you have one searchable log store. Everything's logs, one place.
The signature approach: SEPARATE ingesting logs from indexing (searching) them. Ingest ALL your logs cheaply (collect everything), but only pay to INDEX (make searchable/retained) the logs you need — deciding with filters what to keep searchable and for how long. So you get everything without paying to index everything. Cost control, built in.
Powerful search and analytics over your indexed logs — fast full-text search, filtering, aggregation, pattern detection — so you can investigate issues, debug errors, and understand what happened. Logs hold the detailed 'what exactly happened'; search unlocks it. Find the answer in your logs.
Generate metrics from logs, alert on log patterns, scan for sensitive data (redact PII), and use Observability Pipelines to route and process logs (including reducing volume/cost before indexing). So logs drive monitoring and are governed. Logs, turned into signals and controlled.
Because it's part of ONE platform, an error log is one click from the related trace (APM) and infrastructure metrics — so you see the log in full context, and go from an error to its full root cause. The unified-platform edge, applied to logs. Logs, connected to everything.
One agent on every machine, one console over all of them — modules attach without a second operational world.
Datadog centralises your logs — correlated with metrics & traces — with Logging without Limits controlling the biggest log problem (cost) — part of portfolio, and paired with the human firewall.
Collect logs from all your systems and applications — servers, containers, cloud, apps, network — into one place, via the agent and integrations. Centralisation is the foundation: all your logs, one searchable store, instead of scattered silos. Everything's logs, together.
Ingest ALL your logs — collect and process everything — at low cost, WITHOUT having to index (and pay to search) all of it. So you never lose logs by not collecting them, and you keep cost down. Ingest everything, decide later what to index. No blind spots.
The key: only pay to INDEX (make searchable and retained) the logs you actually need to search — using filters to decide what to index and for how long. So your (higher) indexing cost applies only to the logs you'll actually query, not the whole firehose. Pay to search what matters. Cost, controlled.
Fast, powerful full-text search over your indexed logs — filter by any field, tag or pattern — so you find the log you need quickly during an investigation. Fast search is what makes logs useful in an incident. Find it fast.
Analytics over logs — aggregate, group, detect patterns, visualise trends — so you understand what's happening at scale, not just individual log lines. Analytics turn a log firehose into insight. Understand your logs, not just read them.
Generate metrics from logs (e.g. error rate) and alert on log patterns — so logs drive monitoring, and you're notified of issues in your logs. Turning logs into metrics and alerts makes them proactive, not just forensic. Logs that alert you.
From an error log, one click to the related trace (APM) and infrastructure metrics — so you see the log in full context and get the complete root cause. The unified-platform correlation, applied to logs — a Datadog signature. Logs, connected to everything.
Scan logs for sensitive data (PII, secrets, card numbers) and redact it — so you don't inadvertently store sensitive data in logs (a compliance and security risk). Protecting sensitive data in logs is essential for compliance. Logs, without the leaks.
Route, transform and process logs (and other telemetry) with Observability Pipelines — including filtering/reducing volume BEFORE it's indexed (to cut cost) and sending to multiple destinations. Pipelines give control over your log flow (and cost). Govern your log firehose.
Choose retention per log (short for searchable, longer via cheap archives) — and archive logs to cheap storage for compliance/rehydration — so you keep what you need, cost-effectively. Flexible retention balances access and cost. Keep logs smartly.
Use centralised logs for audit trails and compliance — a searchable record of activity — with sensitive-data protection and retention controls. Logs are essential for audit and compliance; Datadog helps you use them well. Your record, searchable and governed.
Logging without Limits, Observability Pipelines, selective indexing, retention tiers and archives all serve ONE goal: controlling log cost (logs are the #1 Datadog cost surprise). Managed well, you log everything AND control spend. Cost-conscious logging is the differentiator. Log fully, pay smartly.
The overview, getting started, and protecting M365 email.
Ingest all, index selectively.
The unified platform.
Logs in context.
Want a live, India-context walkthrough on your own fleet?
Book a guided demo →Here’s what genuinely sets Datadog Log Management apart (and where cost lives).
The defining reason to consider Datadog Log Management is its 'Logging without Limits' model — which separates ingesting logs from indexing them — directly solving the single biggest problem with log management at scale: COST. The log-cost dilemma: logs are essential — they hold the detailed record of what exactly happened in your systems (the granular detail metrics and traces summarise), invaluable for debugging, investigation, audit and compliance. But modern systems generate ENORMOUS log volumes (containers, microservices, cloud, high-traffic apps produce huge amounts), and log management is famously EXPENSIVE at scale — traditionally, you pay to store and index (make searchable) all that log volume, and the cost balloons. This creates a painful dilemma: Log everything — comprehensive, but hugely expensive (you pay to index a massive firehose). Log little — cheaper, but you have blind spots (the log you need for an incident might be one you didn't keep). Neither is good — you shouldn't have to choose between comprehensive logging and controlling cost. Yet traditional log tools force this trade-off, and log cost is a top pain (and, in Datadog, the #1 source of 'bill shock'). Datadog's Logging without Limits: Datadog pioneered a model that breaks the dilemma by SEPARATING two things you traditionally paid for together: Ingest — collecting and processing logs. With Datadog, you ingest ALL your logs CHEAPLY (a low per-GB ingest cost) — so you collect everything, no blind spots. Index — making logs searchable and retained (the expensive part). You only pay to INDEX the logs you actually need to search, deciding with filters what to keep searchable and for how long. So you ingest EVERYTHING (comprehensive, cheap) but INDEX SELECTIVELY (pay for search only on what matters). You get the best of both: comprehensive logging AND cost control. And you can even reduce volume before indexing (Observability Pipelines), archive cheaply for compliance, and rehydrate archived logs if needed. Why it matters: this directly solves the biggest log-management problem — the cost-vs-coverage dilemma. You no longer choose between logging everything (expensive) and logging little (blind); you log everything but pay to search only what you need. For organisations with high log volumes (most modern ones), this is genuinely valuable — it's how you get comprehensive logs without runaway cost. It's Datadog's distinctive answer to the log-cost problem, and the key to using Datadog logs well (given logs are the top Datadog cost concern). The value: Datadog's 'Logging without Limits' separates ingesting (cheap, collect everything) from indexing (pay to search only what you need) — solving the biggest log problem, cost, so you get comprehensive logging AND cost control. For log management at scale, this matters. TechBag helps organisations log comprehensively AND cost-effectively with Datadog. TechBag helps you log everything without the runaway bill.
A key strength of Datadog Log Management is that logs are part of the ONE unified platform, correlated with metrics and traces — so from an error log you're one click from the trace and infrastructure context, seeing the log in full context rather than in isolation. Logs in isolation aren't enough: logs hold detailed information (the exact error, the specific event), but in isolation they lack context: an error log tells you WHAT happened, but not the full picture — which request/trace it belonged to (was this part of a slow request?), what the infrastructure was doing (was the host overloaded?), what the user experienced. To fully understand an issue, you need to see the log IN CONTEXT of the related trace, metrics and (ideally) user session. Traditionally, logs are in a SEPARATE tool from your metrics and tracing — so you find an error in your logging tool, then jump to your APM and infrastructure tools to get context, manually correlating. Slow and disconnected. Datadog's unified correlation: In Datadog, logs are on the SAME platform as metrics (Infrastructure Monitoring) and traces (APM), correlated by shared tags: From an error log, ONE CLICK to the related TRACE (APM) — which request this error was part of, and its full journey. From the log, one click to the infrastructure METRICS — what the host/container was doing. And from the trace, on to the affected user session (RUM). So an error log isn't isolated — it's connected to the request it belonged to, the infrastructure state, and the user impact, all one click away. So you see the log in FULL CONTEXT — error + trace + infrastructure + user — and get the complete root cause, without jumping between separate tools. Why it matters: context is everything in troubleshooting — an error log is far more useful when you can immediately see the request it was part of and the infrastructure state. Datadog's correlation makes this seamless (one platform, one click), versus the slow tool-jumping of separate logging/metrics/tracing tools. This speeds investigation and gives the complete picture — Datadog's signature strength, applied to logs. For fast, complete troubleshooting, having logs correlated with everything else is enormously valuable. The value: Datadog Log Management has logs correlated with metrics and traces on ONE platform — so from an error log, one click to the trace, infrastructure and user context — giving full context and complete root cause, not isolated log lines. For contextual troubleshooting, this matters. TechBag helps organisations get logs in full context with Datadog. TechBag helps you see logs connected to everything, not in isolation.
A core strength of Datadog Log Management is powerful search and analytics over your logs, plus turning logs into metrics and alerts — so your logs are not just stored, but actively useful for investigation, insight and proactive monitoring. Logs must be usable, not just stored: collecting logs is only valuable if you can actually USE them — search them fast during an incident, analyse them for insight, and turn them into signals. Logs that are stored but hard to search or analyse are of limited value. So the search, analytics and monitoring capabilities matter as much as the collection. What Datadog provides: Fast, powerful search — full-text search over your indexed logs, filtering by any field, tag or pattern, so you find the log you need quickly (critical during an incident when time matters). Log analytics — aggregate, group, detect patterns and visualise trends across your logs, so you understand what's happening at scale (not just individual lines) — e.g. spotting a spike in a particular error. Log-based metrics — generate metrics FROM logs (e.g. count of a specific error, rate of a log pattern), so log data feeds your monitoring and dashboards. Log-based alerts — alert on log patterns (e.g. notify when a critical error appears or spikes), so logs proactively warn you, not just serve as forensic record. Live tail and exploration — watch logs in real time and explore flexibly. So your logs are actively useful: searchable for investigation, analysable for insight, and turned into metrics and alerts for proactive monitoring — not just a passive store. Why it matters: usable logs deliver real value: Faster investigation — fast search finds the answer quickly during incidents. Insight — analytics reveal patterns and trends you'd miss in raw logs. Proactive monitoring — log-based metrics and alerts turn logs from forensic-only into early warning. Understanding — you comprehend your systems' behaviour through their logs. For getting value from logs (which requires them to be usable, not just stored), Datadog's search, analytics and log-driven monitoring are strong — making your logs an active asset for investigation, insight and monitoring. The value: Datadog Log Management provides powerful search and analytics over your logs, plus log-based metrics and alerts — so your logs are actively useful for fast investigation, insight and proactive monitoring, not just stored. For getting value from logs, this matters. TechBag helps organisations get active value from their logs with Datadog. TechBag helps you search, analyse and act on your logs.
A distinctive and practically vital strength of Datadog Log Management is its cost-control and governance capabilities — Observability Pipelines, sensitive-data scanning, and flexible retention — which matter because logs are the #1 source of Datadog cost surprises, and controlling and governing them is essential to using Datadog logs well. Why cost control is vital for logs: as established, log volume is huge and log cost is the top Datadog 'bill shock' cause. So the tools to CONTROL log cost and GOVERN log data aren't just nice-to-haves — they're essential to using Datadog Log Management successfully (and are exactly where a partner adds value). Datadog provides several: Logging without Limits (the core) — ingest everything cheaply, index selectively (covered) — the primary cost lever. Observability Pipelines — route, transform and process logs BEFORE they're indexed, including FILTERING and REDUCING volume (dropping noisy/low-value logs, sampling, aggregating) to cut cost, and sending logs to multiple destinations. This lets you shape and shrink your log flow proactively — a powerful cost-control tool. Selective indexing and retention tiers — index only what you'll search, and choose retention per log (short searchable retention, longer via cheap archives). Cheap archives + rehydration — archive logs to inexpensive storage for compliance, and rehydrate (re-index) archived logs only if you later need to search them — so you keep everything for compliance without paying to keep it all searchable. Sensitive Data Scanner — governance: scan and redact PII/secrets in logs (compliance and security). So you have a toolkit to control log cost (pipelines, selective indexing, retention, archives) and govern log data (redaction, retention) — essential for managing the log firehose cost-effectively and compliantly. Why it matters: because log cost is the top Datadog concern, having strong cost-control tools — and using them well — is what makes Datadog logs deliver value rather than bill shock. Managed well (ingest everything, index/retain selectively, reduce volume via pipelines, archive cheaply), you get comprehensive, compliant logging at a controlled cost. This is exactly where expertise and a partner matter — which is TechBag's role. The value: Datadog Log Management provides cost-control and governance tools — Logging without Limits, Observability Pipelines, selective indexing/retention, cheap archives, and sensitive-data redaction — so you can log comprehensively AND control cost and compliance. Given logs are the top cost concern, this matters most. TechBag helps organisations control and govern their log cost with Datadog. TechBag helps you tame the log bill and stay compliant.
Datadog Log Management comes from Datadog — the observability leader (NASDAQ: DDOG) — with the strength of the unified platform, the pioneering Logging without Limits model, and the honest caveat that logs are the top Datadog cost concern (so management is essential). The leading platform, unified: Datadog is the leading observability platform, and its Log Management is a core, strong part — with the distinctive Logging without Limits cost model, powerful search/analytics, and (crucially) correlation with metrics and traces on one platform. For log management — essential for investigation, audit and compliance — having it correlated with your full observability, from the leader, is powerful. The Logging without Limits pioneer: Datadog pioneered the ingest-vs-index separation that addresses log cost — a genuinely distinctive and valuable approach to the biggest log problem. The honest caveat — logs are the top cost concern: we're upfront: logs are priced per GB ingested PLUS per million events indexed (public, transparent), and log cost is the single most common source of Datadog 'bill shock' — high log volumes and over-indexing can balloon the bill. So while Logging without Limits and Pipelines PROVIDE the tools to control cost, USING them well is essential — and getting log cost management right is exactly where a partner adds most value. Datadog logs are powerful and cost-controllable, but log-cost management is the key to good value. India relevance: for India's log-generating cloud-native companies and compliance-driven organisations, Datadog Log Management is relevant. Via TechBag (Bengaluru-based), Indian organisations get it with local scoping, and — critically — log-cost management, plus GST (Datadog bills USD). The value: Datadog Log Management — from the observability leader, with the pioneering Logging without Limits cost model, correlated on one platform — centralises your logs powerfully, with the vital log-cost management handled by TechBag. TechBag supplies it with cost management and local support. TechBag provides leading log management, with the log bill tamed.
Datadog Log Management centralises logs from across your systems and applications into one searchable place — with the pioneering 'Logging without Limits' cost model (ingest all cheaply, index selectively), powerful search and analytics, log-based metrics and alerts, sensitive-data scanning, Observability Pipelines (route/reduce/process logs), and — crucially — correlation with metrics and traces on one platform (log → trace → infra, one click). From the observability leader (NASDAQ: DDOG). The honest framing — strengths, cost, and competition: Log Management's strengths are Logging without Limits (the distinctive cost model), the unified-platform correlation (logs in full context), powerful search/analytics, and cost-governance tools (Pipelines, retention, archives, redaction). Its honest caveat is that logs are the TOP Datadog cost concern — so log-cost management is essential (the tools exist; using them well is key). The competitive landscape: Splunk (now Cisco) is the log/SIEM heavyweight — extremely powerful for logs and security analytics, deeply entrenched in large enterprises (and can be very expensive); for the deepest log/SIEM at large enterprise scale, Splunk is a leader. Elastic (ELK — Elasticsearch, Logstash, Kibana) is popular, powerful and cost-effective, especially self-managed (open-source heritage), but more DIY. Grafana Loki (part of the LGTM stack) is a cost-effective, open-source-leaning log tool designed for low cost at scale (more DIY, less rich than Datadog). Cloud-native log tools (CloudWatch Logs, Azure Monitor Logs) are cheaper within one cloud but weaker cross-cloud and on UX/correlation. So the honest positioning: for the deepest log/SIEM at enterprise scale, Splunk; for cost-effective, DIY-friendly logging, Elastic or Grafana Loki; for single-cloud, the cloud-native tools; and Datadog Log Management is most compelling when you want logs UNIFIED and correlated with your full observability (metrics, traces) on one platform, with the Logging without Limits cost model — especially if you already use Datadog for monitoring/APM (the correlation is the payoff). The key is managing log cost well. TechBag scopes Log Management honestly — and, most importantly, MANAGES the log cost (Logging without Limits, Pipelines, retention, archives) — comparing vs Splunk/Elastic/Loki, and supports it (GST; Datadog bills USD).
Your log volume and sources, what you need to search/retain vs just keep, compliance needs (PII, retention), and — crucially — the cost (logs are the #1 Datadog cost). TechBag scopes it and designs the cost-control approach first.
Collect logs from all your sources into Datadog — ingesting everything cheaply (Logging without Limits) — so no blind spots, cost controlled from the start.
Set up selective indexing (search only what you need), Observability Pipelines (reduce volume), retention tiers and archives, and PII redaction — so logs are useful, compliant AND cost-controlled.
Use the log → trace → infra correlation for fast root cause, and continuously manage log cost (volume, indexing, discounts). TechBag governs the spend and supports you (GST; Datadog bills USD).
Trusted across regulated industries in 100+ countries
Modelled on Gartner Peer Insights structure. *Counts and breakdowns are illustrative pending verified review collection.
“Logging without Limits solved our log-cost dilemma — we ingest ALL our logs cheaply but only index what we need to search. No more choosing between comprehensive logging and controlling cost. That model is genuinely distinctive.”
“Having logs correlated with our metrics and traces — one click from an error log to the trace and infrastructure context — makes investigation dramatically faster than jumping between separate tools. The unified platform is the payoff.”
“Observability Pipelines let us filter and reduce log volume BEFORE indexing — a powerful cost lever. Combined with cheap archives for compliance, we log comprehensively AND control spend. TechBag set up the cost governance.”
“Sensitive Data Scanner redacts PII in our logs automatically — essential for compliance. And flexible retention (short searchable, cheap archives) keeps us compliant without runaway cost.”
“Honest truth: logs were our biggest Datadog cost surprise at first. TechBag's log-cost management — indexing selectively, pipelines to reduce volume, retention tuning, a committed discount — brought it under control. Managed, it's great value.”
“We compared Splunk (powerful but pricey) and Elastic (cost-effective, more DIY) — but for logs unified with our Datadog metrics and traces, correlated, Datadog won. TechBag gave an honest comparison and managed the cost.”
“Fast search and log analytics find the answer quickly during incidents, and log-based alerts warn us of error spikes proactively. Our logs became an active asset, not just a store.”
“Datadog bills logs per GB ingested plus per million indexed, in USD — it needs active management, but TechBag handled the cost governance and GST. For unified, correlated logs, worth it.”
Analyst firms bury this view behind paywalls, and G2 retired its Grid. So here’s TechBag’s synthesis of the log management market — tap any vendor to see why it sits where it does.
Execution strength vs product vision — the classic market map, minus the paywall.
Unified, correlated; Logging without Limits. This page's product.
The grid nobody publishes — how strong the email detection is vs how integrated with the wider security portfolio.
Correlated + cost model.
Positions are TechBag’s illustrative synthesis of public review-platform data and vendor documentation — not a reproduction of any analyst graphic. Verify before relying on it.
Splunk, Elastic, Grafana Loki and cloud-native — honest lanes; the edge is logs unified & correlated with observability + the Logging without Limits cost model (but logs are the #1 Datadog cost — manage it). Deepest log/SIEM? Splunk. Cheapest OSS? Elastic/Loki. We say so.
| Dimension | Datadog Logs | Splunk (Cisco) | Elastic (ELK) | Grafana Loki | Cloud-native logs | Chronosphere |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Position | Unified logs, correlated; Logging without Limits | Log/SIEM heavyweight (powerful, pricey) | Popular, cost-effective, DIY-friendly (ELK) | Cost-effective OSS logs at scale (LGTM) | CloudWatch/Azure Logs (per-cloud) | Cost-control at hyperscale |
| Cost model (ingest vs index) | Logging without Limits (distinctive) | Volume-based (can be costly) | You control (self-managed) | Low-cost by design | Per-GB (per cloud) | Cost-control-first |
| Search & analytics | Powerful | Very powerful (SPL) | Powerful (Elasticsearch) | Good (label-based) | Basic-moderate | Metrics-focused |
| Correlated with metrics & traces | Yes — one platform (log→trace→infra) | Via Observability Cloud | Via Elastic Observability | Via Grafana stack | Some | Metrics-led |
| Governance (PII, pipelines, retention) | Yes (Scanner, Pipelines, tiers) | Yes (mature) | DIY | Some | Some | Some |
| SIEM / security analytics | Yes (Cloud SIEM on logs) | SIEM leader (Splunk ES) | Elastic SIEM | No | Basic | No |
| Ease of use / managed | Easy (SaaS) | Enterprise setup | Managed or DIY | More DIY | Native (per cloud) | Managed |
| Cost / predictability | Top Datadog cost — MUST manage | Often very expensive | Cost-effective (esp. self-managed) | Very cost-effective | Cheaper per-cloud | Cost-optimised |
| Best fit | Logs unified & correlated with observability (cost managed) | Deepest enterprise log/SIEM | Cost-effective, DIY-friendly logging | Cheapest OSS logs at scale | Single-cloud, budget | Hyperscale cost-control |
Honest fit signals — because the fastest way to lose your trust is to pretend one product wins every scenario.
Drag the sliders (count log GB/sources; engineer-hour cost as loaded rate). Estimates contrast scattered/costly logs (blind spots or runaway indexing cost, slow search) vs Datadog (centralised, correlated, Logging without Limits) — the wins are faster investigation and comprehensive-yet-controlled logging. NB: logs are the #1 Datadog cost — TechBag manages it. Illustrative.
Loaded cost = salary + overheads per productive hour. Illustrative only — your TechBag quote models actual device counts and modules.
Datadog Logs are priced (publicly) per GB ingested + per million events indexed — and logs are the #1 source of Datadog 'bill shock'. So cost management (Logging without Limits, Pipelines, retention) is ESSENTIAL. Datadog bills in USD. TechBag makes log-cost management the priority, and handles GST.
Best for unified, correlated logs
Best for a broader rollout
Best value with TechBag
Whatever the list prices above, TechBag negotiates a significantly better deal — with GST-compliant INR invoicing and local support. Ask us for your discounted quote.
Tell us your device counts and current tools — we’ll model it against what you spend today.
Take this into your next vendor call — including ours.
Are your logs scattered? Datadog centralises them into one searchable place, correlated with metrics and traces.
Do you struggle with log cost vs coverage? Logging without Limits (ingest all, index selectively) solves it — comprehensive logs, controlled cost.
Logs are the TOP source of Datadog bill shock — managing volume (indexing, pipelines, retention) is essential. TechBag makes cost control the priority.
Want logs in context? Datadog's log → trace → infra correlation (one platform, one click) beats isolated logs in a separate tool.
Need PII redaction and retention control (compliance)? Sensitive Data Scanner, Pipelines and retention tiers govern your logs.
High log volume? Observability Pipelines filter and reduce it BEFORE indexing — a powerful cost lever.
Deepest log/SIEM? Splunk. Cost-effective/DIY? Elastic or Grafana Loki. Single-cloud? Cloud-native. TechBag compares honestly.
Datadog bills logs per GB ingested + per million indexed, in USD — TechBag manages the cost and handles GST.
Scope Datadog Log Management (all your logs, correlated, with Logging without Limits) — and let a TechBag advisor make log-cost management the priority (selective indexing, Pipelines to reduce volume, retention strategy, committed discounts), and handle GST.
Stats, ratings, review counts and pricing are illustrative and sourced from public materials; verify before purchase.