- BFSIBanking, Financial Services & Insurance
- HealthcareComing soon
- ManufacturingComing soon
- Retail & E-CommerceComing soon
DSPM
Find the data first. Exposure is who can reach it — LinkShadow DSPM finds sensitive data and maps who can reach it — correlated with the network and identity signal on the same platform. Honest: the newest module, in a crowded field.
Buy through TechBag
Same software. Better outcome — at a lower cost.
How it’s rated
Full scoreboard ↓Quick answer
The LinkShadow platform family
This page covers DSPM — the data module. The rest of the platform:
Quick facts
30-second orientation- Product
- DSPM — a CyberMeshX platform module
- What it does
- Discovers, classifies and maps exposure of data
- Best case
- Extending an existing LinkShadow NDR deployment
- Analyst recognition
- None for this module — the MQ is for NDR
- Rivals
- Varonis, Cyera, Securiti, Wiz — all deeper
- India residency
- Not offered — policy allows storage anywhere
- DPDP reporting
- Not documented
- Pricing
- Quote-only — no published price
- In India via
- TechBag — INR/GST, scoping and honest comparison
Understand data security posture management before you buy it
Most product pages skip this. We start here — so you buy a capability, not a buzzword.
What is LinkShadow DSPM?
Find sensitive data and see who can reach it — discovery and classification across object stores, databases and SaaS, plus exposure analysis and least-privilege recommendations, as a module on the CyberMeshX platform.
Unclassified data vs a mapped estate — the honest table
What consolidation actually replaces, dimension by dimension.
| Dimension | Unclassified, unmapped data | DSPM (LinkShadow) |
|---|---|---|
| What you know | Where data is supposed to be | Where it actually is, and who can reach it |
| Scope here | A standalone DSPM programme | A module that extends an NDR deployment |
| Analyst standing | Specialists evaluated in this category | None for this module — the MQ is for NDR |
| Remediation | Acts, tickets or reports — ask which | Recommends; confirm the rest in a PoC |
| Correlation | One signal, one console | Data risk beside network and identity |
| India residency | Documented by some specialists | Not offered — policy allows storage anywhere |
The 2026 Gartner Visionaries placement is for LinkShadow's NDR, NOT this module. There is no independent analyst evaluation of its DSPM, and no India data residency.
The five pieces of the platform
Vendors love diagrams; buyers need to know what they’re actually operating. Here’s the whole platform, demystified.
Discovery and classification
Connectors reach object stores, databases and SaaS to find and classify sensitive data. Everything downstream depends on this being complete — so ask for the connector list against YOUR inventory, not the total count, before a proof of concept.
Exposure analysis
Knowing where data lives is half the problem; the risk is who can reach it, through which permission or share link. Be precise about how DEEP that goes — effective permissions through nested groups and inherited rights is the hard part, and where the specialists have spent years.
Least-privilege recommendations
The module surfaces over-exposure and recommends fixes. Confirm in a PoC what it will DO versus REPORT: act on permissions, raise a ticket, or only tell you. That distinction changes the operational cost far more than the feature count.
CyberMeshX correlation
The strongest case for this module. An over-permissive store, reached by an identity behaving anomalously, on a beaconing host, is a compound detection no single-purpose DSPM tool produces alone. The caveat: it requires owning more than one module.
Scan cadence and drift
Stores appear, permissions change, data moves — a posture answer is only as current as its last scan. Establish the cadence and what it costs in time and API quota. This is also where discovery gaps hide: a store nobody connected is invisible rather than reported.
One telemetry fabric across endpoint, cloud, and network — threats correlated once, not chased console to console.
Six capabilities. Discover, expose, correlate.
LinkShadow DSPM finds sensitive data and maps who can actually reach it — as a module on the portfolio, and paired with the human firewall.
Find sensitive data across the estate
Connectors reach object stores, databases and SaaS applications to locate data. Check the connector list against your own inventory rather than against the total count — coverage of the stores YOU use is what determines whether the answer is complete.
Decide what is actually sensitive
Classification turns a file inventory into a risk picture. For Indian estates, ask specifically whether Indian data types are recognised out of the box or need custom rules — LinkShadow does not document this, so treat it as a proof-of-concept question.
See who can reach what
Maps access paths to sensitive data and highlights over-permissive rights. How deeply it resolves nested groups and inherited permissions is the question that separates DSPM tools; probe it against your messiest share rather than a clean demo tenant.
Rank exposures by what matters
Not every over-permissive folder is worth an escalation. Prioritisation should reflect data sensitivity and reachability together, so that the queue your team works is the queue that reduces risk fastest.
Recommend the least-privilege fix
Surfaces what to tighten and why. Confirm whether it acts, tickets or only reports — this single answer changes the operational cost of running the product more than any feature comparison will.
Read data risk beside network and identity
The real argument for this module: exposure findings correlate with NDR and ITDR signal in one console, producing compound detections that a standalone DSPM cannot. It only pays off if you own more than one module.
Watch LinkShadow DSPM explained
The data module explained, and the platform argument behind it.
Ahmad Fida Explains LinkShadow DSPM
The data-posture module, explained by its CSO.
From Security Silos to Unified Cyber Intelligence
The CyberMeshX consolidation argument.
Consolidation Reduces Tools. Integration Eliminates Silos.
Why the modules are pitched together.
LinkShadow Corporate Video 2026
The company and the platform, in its own words.
Want a live, India-context walkthrough for your environment?
Book a guided demo →Knowing where data lives is half. Who can reach it is the risk.
Here’s the honest case for this module — and where the specialists are the better buy.
The consolidation argument — and its precondition
The genuine reason to consider LinkShadow DSPM is correlation rather than depth. Data-exposure findings land in the same console as the network and identity signal from LinkShadow’s NDR and ITDR modules, which means an over-permissive data store can be read alongside the behaviour around it. An identity acting anomalously, on a host that is beaconing outbound, reaching a store it has never touched before, is a far higher-confidence finding than any one of those signals alone, and it is the kind of detection that separate tools structurally cannot produce because none of them sees the other two. That is a real architectural argument. Its precondition is equally real: it only pays off if you own more than one module. A buyer purchasing DSPM alone gets a console rather than an advantage, and takes on vendor-concentration risk with a small vendor in exchange. TechBag prices the modules separately for exactly this reason — so the consolidation case has to prove itself on your numbers rather than on a diagram.
Be honest about the field you are buying into
DSPM is one of the most crowded categories in security, and LinkShadow is among its least-proven entrants. Varonis has spent years on effective-permission analysis and reaches on-premises file shares that cloud-first tools do not scan. Cyera and Wiz are cloud-native specialists with deep track records. Securiti, now part of Veeam, spans discovery and privacy automation. All four have named customer references, more India presence, and analyst recognition in this specific category — TechBag sells several of them. LinkShadow’s 2026 Gartner placement in Visionaries is for its NDR, not for DSPM, and there is no independent analyst evaluation of this module at all. That does not make it a bad product; it makes it an unproven one, and the difference matters when the buying decision is standalone. Where LinkShadow wins is the correlation case on an estate that already runs its NDR. Where it does not, TechBag will point at the specialists rather than defend a weaker fit.
A data-security product with no data residency
This gap is worth stating directly because of what the product does. LinkShadow offers NO India data residency: its own privacy policy states that data may be used, processed or stored anywhere in the world, and the company makes no DPDP Act, RBI, SEBI, IRDAI or CERT-In claim anywhere in its documentation. For a module whose entire function is discovering and classifying sensitive data, a regulated Indian buyer is entitled to ask exactly what metadata about that data leaves the country, and to get the answer in writing before a proof of concept rather than after. LinkShadow’s India office in Kochi and its Truvisor distribution agreement for India and SAARC are both real and both recent; neither is residency. If in-country handling is a hard requirement, the honest path is to scope the deployment architecture explicitly with LinkShadow and to treat any verbal assurance as unconfirmed until it is contractual. TechBag will not represent an office address as a residency commitment.
Ask what it does, not just what it finds
The question that most changes the operational cost of a DSPM deployment is rarely on the feature comparison: what happens after a finding. There is a large practical difference between a tool that ACTS on permissions directly, one that raises a ticket into your existing workflow, and one that only REPORTS what it found and leaves the work to a human. A product in the third category can still be valuable, but it needs an owner and a process behind it, or the findings accumulate into a backlog that nobody works — the same failure that turns vulnerability scanners into report generators. Confirm this in a proof of concept against your real estate rather than a demo tenant, and probe the depth of exposure analysis at the same time: effective permissions through nested groups, inherited rights and share links are the hard part of this category, and a clean demo environment will never show you where a tool’s analysis stops.
The numbers behind the platform
What your LinkShadow DSPM evaluation looks like
Decide standalone or extension
This is the question that determines the answer. If you already run LinkShadow NDR, the correlation case is real. If not, TechBag will compare honestly against Varonis, Cyera, Securiti and Wiz — and will often recommend one of them.
Check connectors against YOUR inventory
Not the total connector count — the specific stores your sensitive data actually sits in. Anything not covered is a gap in the answer the product gives you, and gaps in a discovery tool are invisible by definition.
Probe exposure depth on the messiest share
Effective permissions through nested groups, inherited rights and share links are the hard part of this category. Test on your worst real estate rather than a clean demo tenant, because that is where a tool's analysis stops.
Establish what it acts on
Acts, tickets or reports? This single answer changes the operational cost more than any feature comparison. If it reports, name the owner of the follow-through before you buy, or the findings become a backlog nobody works.
Get the residency answer in writing
LinkShadow offers no India data residency and its policy allows storage anywhere in the world. For a product that catalogues sensitive data, establish exactly what leaves the country — contractually, not verbally.
Re-check coverage as the estate moves
New stores appear constantly. A DSPM answer is only as current as its last scan and only as complete as its connector coverage, so review both on a schedule rather than after an incident.
The review scoreboard
Modelled on Gartner Peer Insights structure. *Counts and breakdowns are illustrative pending verified review collection.
Quick poll — what’s driving your evaluation?
Talk to an advisor“We bought it to extend our NDR deployment, not on its own merits. Reading a data exposure beside the network behaviour around it is genuinely better than two consoles — that is the whole value for us.”
“Discovery covered our cloud stores well. Ask hard about depth of permission analysis if your file shares are messy — ours were, and we found the limits during the PoC rather than after.”
“It reports well. Understand before you buy that the remediation is guidance, so you need someone who owns the follow-through or the findings just pile up.”
“We evaluated it against Varonis and Cyera and went elsewhere for standalone DSPM. Fair from the reseller — TechBag told us up front this was the weaker case without the NDR alongside it.”
Where everyone sits — the grids
Analyst firms bury this view behind paywalls, and G2 retired its Grid. So here’s TechBag’s synthesis of the DSPM market — tap any vendor to see why it sits where it does.
TechBag DSPM Grid
Execution strength vs product vision — the classic market map, minus the paywall.
Newest module; strongest beside its own NDR.
Detection × Portfolio Integration
The grid nobody publishes — depth in data security vs how much the platform correlates with other signal.
Thin standalone; strong platform correlation.
Positions are TechBag’s illustrative synthesis of public review-platform data and vendor documentation — not a reproduction of any analyst graphic. Verify before relying on it.
LinkShadow DSPM vs the data-security specialists
Varonis, Cyera and Wiz are deeper and better proven — the honest case for LinkShadow is correlation, not depth.
| Dimension | LinkShadow DSPM | Varonis | Cyera | Wiz |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst recognition for DSPM | None | Established | Established | Established |
| Effective-permission depth | Basic — probe it | Deep | Good | Good |
| On-premises file shares | Confirm | Yes | Cloud-first | Cloud-first |
| Remediation | Recommends | Acts | Workflow | Workflow |
| India data residency | Not offered | Confirm | Confirm | Confirm |
| Published pricing | None at all | Quote-only | Quote-only | Quote-only |
| Named public customers | None published | Published | Published | Published |
| Correlation with network + identity | Yes — CyberMeshX | Data-centric | Data-centric | Cloud-wide |
Which cybersecurity approach fits you?
Honest fit signals — because the fastest way to lose your trust is to pretend one product wins every scenario.
Choose LinkShadow DSPM if…
- ✓You are ALREADY deploying LinkShadow NDR and want data-exposure context in a console your team already watches
- ✓The compound detection matters to you — an over-exposed store, an anomalous identity and a beaconing host read together
- ✓You are comfortable with an unproven module in a crowded field, and are buying it as an extension rather than a programme
Choose a DSPM specialist instead if…
- ✓This is a standalone data-security programme — Varonis, Cyera, Securiti and Wiz all have deeper track records and named references, and TechBag sells several
- ✓Your sensitive data lives partly on on-premises file shares, where Varonis reaches what cloud-first tools do not
- ✓You need automated remediation rather than recommendations, or analyst recognition in this specific category
- ✓India data residency is a hard requirement — LinkShadow offers none, and its policy allows storage anywhere in the world
Run a bake-off first if…
- ✓This is a standalone data-security programme rather than an NDR extension
- ✓Your sensitive data spans cloud stores AND on-premises file shares
- ✓TechBag sells Varonis, Cyera, Securiti and Wiz too — we would rather compare honestly than steer you
Revisit in twelve months if…
- ✓You are evaluating LinkShadow NDR but have not committed — the correlation case depends on it
- ✓India data residency is a hard requirement today, which LinkShadow does not currently offer
- ✓You want analyst validation in this specific category before presenting to a board
Do not buy DSPM at all if…
- ✓Nobody owns the remediation — findings become a backlog, the way unowned scanner output always does
- ✓You cannot connect the stores where your sensitive data actually lives; coverage gaps are invisible by definition
- ✓You want a compliance certificate rather than an operational control — this reduces risk, it does not issue attestations
DSPM is one of 16 DSPM & data discovery products TechBag carries. The DSPM & Data Discovery guide narrows them to a shortlist and shows the reasoning. →
What does not knowing cost you?
Drag the sliders (data stores in scope; IT-hour cost as loaded rate). Estimates model the effort of answering ‘where is our sensitive data and who can reach it’ by hand — the avoided-breach value of finding an over-exposed store first is the larger, unpriced win. Illustrative.
Loaded cost = salary + overheads per productive hour. Illustrative only — your TechBag quote models your actual environment and modules.
Three ways to consume it
LinkShadow publishes NO price. TechBag scopes the connectors and data stores, quotes in INR with GST, and prices modules SEPARATELY so consolidation has to prove itself.
DSPM (module)
Best as an NDR extension
- Discovery, classification & exposure analysis
- Recommends least-privilege fixes
- No analyst recognition of its own
+ Platform add-ons
Best for a broader rollout
- Scoped to your estate
- Add-on modules as needed
- Phased, right-sized deployment
+ NDR & ITDR correlation
Best if you own more than one
- Data risk read beside network & identity
- Compound detections single tools cannot make
- Concentrates risk on a small vendor
Buy it for less — TechBag pricing beats list
Whatever the list prices above, TechBag negotiates a significantly better deal — with GST-compliant INR invoicing and local support. Ask us for your discounted quote.
Get an India-ready quote
Tell us your requirements and current tools — we’ll model it against what you spend today.
The 8 questions to ask every vendor
Take this into your next vendor call — including ours.
Are you already running LinkShadow NDR? If not, the specialists are usually the stronger buy — ask TechBag to compare rather than pitch.
Do the connectors reach the specific stores YOUR sensitive data sits in? Check against your inventory, not against a total count.
How far does permission analysis resolve — nested groups, inheritance, share links? Test on your messiest real share.
Is any sensitive data on on-premises file shares? Coverage there is undocumented; Varonis is the specialist that reaches them.
Does it act on permissions, raise a ticket, or only report? Name the owner of the follow-through before you buy.
Are Indian data types recognised out of the box or do they need custom rules? Not documented — make it a PoC question.
What metadata about your sensitive data leaves India? LinkShadow offers no residency; get the answer in writing.
Does your board expect analyst validation? There is none for this module — the 2026 Visionaries placement is for NDR.
Questions buyers ask
Ready to evaluate LinkShadow DSPM?
Scope the connector coverage against your own inventory, or let a TechBag advisor compare it honestly against Varonis, Cyera, Securiti and Wiz — several of which we also sell.
Stats, ratings, review counts and pricing are illustrative and sourced from public materials; verify before purchase.