Zero trust at the switch port — switching, routing and full security inspection converged on the same VOS™ that runs Versa’s SD-WAN and SSE. Contain a compromised or IoT device at the port it plugs into, not after it has moved laterally.
Buy through TechBag
Same software. Better outcome — at a lower cost.
How it’s rated
Full scoreboard ↓Quick answer
This page covers Secure SD-LAN. Versa also offers:
Most product pages skip this. We start here — so you buy a capability, not a buzzword.
Secure SD-LAN brings zero trust and IoT security natively to the campus and branch LAN — the switch port. Full security inspection runs AT the access switch, and compromised devices are microsegmented in real time.
It runs the same VOS™ as Versa's SD-WAN and SSE — one OS, one console, one policy from port to cloud.
What changes when security moves to the switch port, dimension by dimension.
| Dimension | Flat, implicitly trusted LAN | Versa Secure SD-LAN |
|---|---|---|
| LAN trust model | Flat, implicit — plug in, you're on | Zero trust at the switch port |
| Where security runs | Backhauled to a central firewall | At the access switch, closest to the host |
| Lateral movement | Happens before inspection sees it | Contained by real-time microsegmentation |
| IoT / OT devices | Unmanaged blind spot | Discovered and protected natively |
| The stack | Switch + firewall + NAC, separate | One converged VOS™ box |
| Policy | A different tool per layer | One language, port to cloud |
| Visibility | Campus LAN is a black hole | Every device and flow, one lake |
| Zero trust reach | Users and WAN only | Users, WAN AND the campus LAN |
Migration is phased — sites move over as access-switch refresh cycles land, pilot site first.
Vendors love diagrams; buyers need to know what they’re actually operating. Here’s Versa Secure SD-LAN, demystified.
Ethernet switches and access points running VOS™ — switching, routing, security and services converged in one box, so inspection happens at the very port a device plugs into.
The single-pass OS behind Versa’s SD-WAN and SSE now runs at the LAN edge, so IPS, malware, CASB, DLP and UTM inspection happens at the switch.
Assesses user and device behaviour and posture continuously, isolating a compromised device into a microsegment in real time.
The same console and uniform policy language that manage SD-WAN and SSE now manage the LAN — one policy model from the switch port to the cloud, single pane of glass.
Complete LAN visibility — every device (managed and IoT), every port, every flow — in the same data lake as the WAN and user security telemetry.
One OS from switch port to cloud — inspection at the port, one Director policy, one data lake with WAN and users.
Everything the campus stack used to split across boxes — switch, LAN firewall, NAC — converged at the port.
Identity, posture and policy decide access when a device plugs in; a network connection earns no implicit trust.
AI/ML UEBA and device posture isolate a compromised or degraded device into a microsegment in real time — the blast radius contained closest to the host.
Discovers, profiles and protects the unmanaged IoT and OT devices flooding modern campuses — cameras, sensors, badge readers — that can't run an agent.
Intrusion prevention runs at the access switch — threats detected at the first port where traffic enters the network, not after they've traversed the LAN.
Anti-malware and antivirus inspection at the switch port — the full UTM stack applied at the LAN edge, no backhaul to a central firewall.
Cloud-app visibility and control applied right at the switch — the same CASB engine as Versa SSE, now enforcing on LAN-originated SaaS traffic.
The same DLP dictionary as SSE, enforced at the LAN edge — sensitive data controlled from the switch port, not just at the cloud gateway.
Switching, routing, security and network services in one VOS™ stack, replacing access switch, LAN firewall and NAC appliance.
Continuous user- and entity-behaviour analytics on LAN traffic — flagging compromised accounts and misbehaving devices by anomaly, not signature.
The same uniform policy language and Director console as SD-WAN and SSE — zero trust defined once, enforced from the switch port to the cloud gateway.
Every device, port and flow — managed and IoT alike — in the same analytics lake as the WAN, ending the campus-LAN blind spot.
The final piece of single-vendor zero trust: users (SSE), sites (SD-WAN) and now the campus LAN (SD-LAN), all on one OS, one console, one policy.
Official use-case demos plus an architect-level walkthrough — the fastest way to judge a console is to see it.
The VersaONE platform Secure SD-LAN extends — one OS from user to WAN to LAN.
Complete visibility — including the campus LAN — in one analytics console.
How the VersaONE pieces fit, LAN edge included — for technical evaluators.
Want a live, India-context walkthrough on your own use case?
Book a guided demo →Most campus LANs still trust whatever plugs in and backhaul inspection to a firewall. Here’s how Versa differs.
SASE secured users and the WAN, but the campus and branch LAN stayed implicitly trusted: plug into a switch port and you're on the network. That flat trust is exactly where a compromised device or rogue IoT gadget spreads. Secure SD-LAN extends zero trust down to the switch port — closing the last implicitly-trusted layer.
Traditional LANs send traffic to a central firewall for inspection — lateral movement happens before anything sees it. Versa runs full inspection (IPS, malware, CASB, DLP, UTM) at the access switch, so threats are caught at the first port they enter, closest to the host.
Modern campuses are flooded with unmanaged devices — cameras, sensors, badge readers, medical and OT gear — that can't run an agent and are attackers' favourite foothold. Secure SD-LAN discovers, profiles and protects them natively at the LAN edge, closing a blind spot NAC bolt-ons never fully solved.
AI/ML UEBA watches every device; the moment one is compromised or degraded, it's isolated into a microsegment automatically — the blast radius contained at the host, not after it's spread across the LAN. Containment by architecture, not by incident response.
This is the final piece of single-vendor zero trust: users on SSE, sites on SD-WAN, and now the campus LAN on SD-LAN — all VOS™, all one Director console, all one uniform policy language. Zero trust defined once and enforced everywhere, instead of a NAC vendor, a switch vendor and a firewall vendor arguing at the port.
One VOS™ box does switching, routing, security and services — collapsing the access switch, LAN firewall and NAC appliance into one. Fewer boxes, one console, one policy, and the sharp challenger commercials TechBag negotiates from, with GST-compliant Indian quotes.
TechBag maps campus LANs, managed and IoT/OT devices, and port-level zero-trust gaps, then sets a pilot site and criteria.
Versa switches/APs deployed at one site; zero trust at the port live; IoT devices discovered and profiled; microsegmentation tested.
Full UTM inspection at the switch enabled; unified policy extended from SSE/SD-WAN to the LAN; the campus blind spot closed in analytics.
Sites converted in waves; access switches, LAN firewalls and NAC appliances collapsed into the converged stack. TechBag models it in INR/GST.
Modelled on Gartner Peer Insights structure. *Counts and breakdowns are illustrative pending verified review collection.
“The campus LAN was our last flat, trusted network. Now a device earns access by identity and posture, not by being plugged in.”
“A compromised laptop was microsegmented at its own switch port in real time, before it moved laterally. Blast radius: one host.”
“Cameras and sensors no agent could touch are now discovered and protected at the LAN edge, closing the blind spot NAC left.”
“One OS from user to WAN to LAN, one Director console and one policy, not three vendors arguing at the port.”
“It collapsed our access switch, LAN firewall and NAC appliance into one box. Fewer boxes, one policy, simpler operations.”
“As the first SD-LAN with native zero trust it is newer than a Cisco campus stack, but for a Versa shop it was the coherent choice.”
“Complete device visibility — managed and IoT — in the same analytics as our WAN. The campus finally stopped being a data black hole.”
“For a Versa SASE customer this is the missing piece — zero trust that finally reaches the switch port, not just the user and the branch.”
Analyst firms bury this view behind paywalls, and review-site grids score satisfaction, not fit for your estate. So here’s TechBag’s synthesis of the secure campus LAN market — tap any vendor to see why it sits where it does.
Execution strength vs product vision — the classic market map, minus the paywall.
The zero-trust-to-LAN pioneer: industry-first SD-LAN with native ZT + IoT security, on the same OS as its Gartner-Leader SD-WAN. Younger in campus mindshare than Cisco/Aruba — pricing and platform-unity reflect it, in your favour.
The grid nobody publishes — who inspects at the switch port, against campus networking depth.
The unified corner: zero trust and full security inspection AT the switch port, on the same OS as user (SSE) and site (SD-WAN) security. Nobody else runs one policy from port to cloud.
Positions are TechBag’s illustrative synthesis of public analyst positioning and vendor documentation — not a reproduction of any analyst graphic. Verify before relying on it.
Cisco, HPE Aruba, Fortinet and Juniper Mist built excellent campus networks. The question is whether security runs at the port or is backhauled to a firewall.
| Dimension | Versa Secure SD-LAN | Cisco (Catalyst + ISE) | HPE Aruba (CX + ClearPass) | Fortinet (FortiSwitch) | Juniper Mist |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture & heritage | SD-LAN on one OS (VOS™) | Campus networking leader | Enterprise campus (HPE) | Security-fabric LAN | AI-driven campus |
| Zero trust at the port | Native | Via ISE | Via ClearPass | Via the fabric | Growing |
| Security inspection at the edge | Full UTM at the switch | Backhaul to firewall | Backhaul to firewall | FortiGate inline | Partner/central |
| IoT / OT security | Native discovery + protect | ISE + Cyber Vision | ClearPass + IoT | FortiNAC | Growing |
| Real-time microsegmentation | AI/ML UEBA, automatic | TrustSec/SGT | Dynamic segmentation | Fabric segments | Policy-based |
| Unified user→WAN→LAN policy | One OS & console | Multiple consoles | Aruba Central | Security Fabric | Mist cloud |
| Best fit | Versa / zero-trust-to-LAN | Cisco estates | Aruba estates | Fortinet fabric | AIOps-led campus |
Honest fit signals — because the fastest way to lose your trust is to pretend one product wins every scenario.
Drag the sliders. Estimates use a blended 40% saving from collapsing access switch, LAN firewall and NAC spend into one converged stack.
Include amortised switches, LAN firewall and NAC appliances plus their support contracts. Illustrative only — your TechBag quote models actual devices.
Secure SD-LAN is priced as part of the VersaONE platform — switches, access points and VOS™ services. TechBag turns any scope into a clear, GST-compliant quote.
Best for proving port-level zero trust
Best at access-switch refresh time
Best for Versa platform estates
Whatever the list prices above, TechBag negotiates a significantly better deal — with GST-compliant INR invoicing and local support. Ask us for your discounted quote.
Tell us your sites and current switch, firewall and NAC estate — we’ll model the collapse over 3 and 5 years.
Take this into your next vendor call — including ours.
Does a device earn access by identity and posture at the switch port — or does plugging in still grant implicit trust?
Is full UTM (IPS, malware, CASB, DLP) applied AT the access switch, or backhauled to a central firewall?
Are unmanaged devices (cameras, sensors, OT) discovered and protected natively — or is that a separate NAC product?
When a device is compromised, is it isolated into a microsegment in real time and automatically — or manually, later?
Is LAN policy the same OS, console and language as your user (SSE) and site (SD-WAN) security — or a different tool?
Does one box do switching, routing and security — or do you still run separate switch, firewall and NAC appliances?
Do you get every device and flow (managed + IoT) in one analytics lake with the WAN — or is the campus a black hole?
Model the collapsed-stack TCO: switch + firewall + NAC replaced by one converged VOS™ box. TechBag quotes it in INR/GST.
Get a quote, scope a pilot site, or bring your switch refresh plan and let a TechBag advisor model the collapsed stack.
Stats, ratings, review counts and pricing are illustrative and sourced from public materials; verify before purchase.