TeraWulf, which builds data centres in New York and Kentucky and leases them out for AI computing, reported net income of US$709.9m for July–September on revenue of US$76.2m. It lost US$88.2m from operations and carried US$53.6m of interest expense.1 The profit came from one line: a US$728.4m gain as the value of share warrants it issued to Google fell with its own share price. On a diluted basis, which counts Google’s warrants as shares and takes that gain back out, TeraWulf’s own figures show a loss of US$18.5m, or three cents a share.2
−US$88.2m
operating loss, July–September
10-Q
+US$728.4m
gain on the Google warrants
10-Q
+US$95.0m
gain on selling its Abernathy stake
10-Q
−US$18.5m
net loss on the diluted basis
10-Q, EPS note
01What TeraWulf owes Google
One of TeraWulf’s AI tenants at its Lake Mariner campus in New York is Fluidstack. Google agreed to backstop Fluidstack’s leases: if Fluidstack misses rent or becomes insolvent, Google either pays a termination fee or pays the rent due and takes over the lease. In return TeraWulf issued Google warrants to buy 73,580,000 of its shares at US$0.01 each, expiring in August 2030; 8,443,606 became exercisable in the quarter, when one of those leases began.2 At a cent apiece, each warrant is worth almost exactly one share.
02Why a falling share price shows up as profit
TeraWulf carries the warrants as a liability, valued each quarter with a Black-Scholes model, and books the change in that value through its income statement.2 When the shares fall, what it owes Google is worth less, and the drop counts as a gain. Its shares closed at US$24.70 on 30 June and US$14.80 on 30 September, 40% lower.7 The liability fell from US$1.82bn to US$1.09bn; the 10-Q puts the US$728.4m gain down to “the fluctuation in the Company’s stock price”.23 It works the other way too: in January–June, when the shares rose, the same line cost US$972.0m, and over nine months it is a US$243.6m loss.234 No cash moves either way: the cash-flow statement adds the change back, and operations used US$178.9m of cash in the nine months.1 The chief financial officer, Patrick Fleury, called it “the non cash fair value adjustment associated with the Google warrants” on the call.6
What TeraWulf owes Google in warrants rose to US$1.82bn and fell back with its share price
Fair value of the Google warrant liability, US$ million, at each quarter end from 31 December 2025, and at the 6 November 2026 close
US$m
Show tableHide table
Warrant liability
31 Dec 25
845
31 Mar 26
1,061
30 Jun 26
1,817
30 Sep 26
1,088
6 Nov 26
836
Source: TeraWulf 10-K and 10-Qs (balance sheets); Nasdaq closing prices · as of 6 November 2026 · 6 Nov is TechBag arithmetic (73.58m warrants × the US$11.37 close less one cent), not a reported value
The TechBag Journal
03The US$19bn Anthropic lease
In its release TeraWulf says it “executed a 20-year lease with Anthropic for approximately 401 MW of critical IT capacity, representing approximately $19 billion of contracted revenue over the initial term”, at its Justified Data Campus in Hawesville, Kentucky.1 The leases were signed in July and had not begun on 30 September; capacity is due in phases from late 2027 to the second quarter of 2028, and Anthropic may extend for two five-year terms.25 On 4 November Google agreed to backstop Anthropic’s obligations, from the day the last data hall begins until Anthropic holds investment-grade ratings for at least three months; if Google pays a termination fee, it may take an equity stake in the TeraWulf subsidiary that owns the campus.5 “TeraWulf is not granting Google any incremental upfront equity here,” Fleury said on the call, and the cost of Google’s support falls on the tenant.6
TeraWulf’s shares closed 12.8% higher at US$11.37 on 6 November, the day of the results.7 What to watch: the warrant line in the fourth quarter, set by the 31 December price; rent beginning at Lake Mariner’s CB-4 building this quarter; and the project debt for Justified.1
Disclosure. TechBag is a software reseller: it earns a margin when a reader buys through it, including from vendors named here. The analysis is TechBag’s own; no vendor paid for or saw this piece before publication. Facts are labelled reported, TechBag count or our view.