Your biggest customer wants a SOC 2 report. A shared drive of screenshots won’t get you there — Iru Compliance Automation drafts controls for SOC 2, ISO 27001 and nine more frameworks, collects the evidence, and shares a platform with Iru’s device and identity products — hosted in the US or EU, not India.
Buy through TechBag
Same software. Better outcome — at a lower cost.
How it’s rated
Full scoreboard ↓Quick answer
This page covers Iru Compliance Automation — audit readiness, licensed per framework. The rest:
Most product pages skip this. We start here — so you buy a capability, not a buzzword.
Software that keeps controls, evidence and policies for an audit in one place, so a SOC 2 or ISO 27001 audit stops being a scramble.
What consolidation actually replaces, dimension by dimension.
| Dimension | Screenshots and spreadsheets | Iru Compliance Automation |
|---|---|---|
| Where controls come from | A downloaded template, edited by hand | AI-generated controls tailored to you |
| How evidence is gathered | Screenshots requested over chat | Connectors collect it from your systems |
| Matching proof to controls | A spreadsheet tab per framework | The Adaptive Evidence Map links them |
| Written policies | Word files in a shared drive | Policy management in the same product |
| Suppliers involved | MDM, GRC tool and trust page apart | One Iru contract, modules licensed apart |
| What it is NOT | — | An audit firm, or a tool for Indian rules |
The cheapest test is the demo itself: bring one customer security questionnaire and see how much of it the generated controls already answer.
Vendors love diagrams; buyers need to know what they’re actually operating. Here’s the whole platform, demystified.
You license the frameworks you need, such as SOC 2 or ISO 27001, and Iru generates controls tailored to your company for each, which become the spine of the audit programme.
Connectors to cloud, monitoring, HR, password and identity tools, AWS, Datadog, Workday, 1Password and JumpCloud among them, collect evidence without a request to each owner.
Collected evidence is mapped onto the controls it supports; Adaptive Compliance and policy management, both added in mid-2026, extend the same workspace towards audit day.
Compliance records sit in the same Iru tenant as the rest of the platform, hosted on AWS in the United States or Germany; no Indian region and no on-premises edition exist.
Frameworks licensed one by one — controls drafted by AI, evidence pulled from your systems, all inside a US or EU tenant.
Iru Compliance Automation turns your connected systems into audit evidence, mapped to controls written for your company.
SOC 2, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, ISO 42001, Cyber Essentials, GDPR, HIPAA, three NIST sets and CMMC appear on the product page.
Iru uses AI to generate controls tailored to the organisation instead of handing every customer one identical stock library.
Shipped in June 2026 with its own launch video; ask in the demo how it changes controls when your audit scope shifts.
Connectors pull evidence from systems you already run, so screenshots and exported spreadsheets stop being the audit artefact.
What Iru calls the Adaptive Evidence Map places each collected artefact against the controls it supports, rather than by hand.
Documented sources include AWS services, Datadog, 1Password, Intercom, Sentry, JumpCloud, Workday and Snowflake, among others.
Policy management arrived in July 2026, putting the written policies auditors request beside the controls and the evidence.
Iru Trust Center shows certifications and reports to customers; it is its own Billing line, not part of the framework licence.
Compliance Automation shares the Iru platform with Endpoint Management, EDR, Vulnerability Management and Workforce Identity.
The 2025 product overview, then the two 2026 launches: Adaptive Compliance and policy management.
The launch overview from October 2025: frameworks, AI-tailored controls and automated evidence in one tour.
Iru’s own introduction to Adaptive Compliance, the June 2026 addition to the product.
How written policies joined the controls and evidence inside Compliance Automation in July 2026.
Want a live, India-context walkthrough for your environment?
Book a guided demo →Where it earns a shortlist place — and the gaps an Indian buyer has to plan around.
Iru sells Compliance Automation on the same platform as its endpoint, EDR, vulnerability and identity products. A company already running Iru on its Macs adds audit preparation as one more module on the same contract and support desk, instead of onboarding a separate GRC supplier.
Instead of a stock control library, Iru generates controls tailored to the company, then places automatically collected evidence against them through its Adaptive Evidence Map. Connectors reach AWS, Datadog, 1Password, Workday and Snowflake, cutting the screenshot-hunting of a first SOC 2.
The list follows export demand: SOC 2 and ISO 27001 for SaaS deals, ISO 27701 for privacy, ISO 42001 for AI, HIPAA for US health data, Cyber Essentials for UK buyers, and NIST 800-171 with CMMC for US defence supply chains. Indian exporters to those markets fit best.
It is about a year old, quoted only after a demo, and it lists no Indian framework: no CERT-In directions, DPDP Act, RBI or SEBI CSCRF mapping. It is not an audit firm and names no auditor network, so the auditor is yours to find and pay. Tenants live in the US or EU only.
Collect security questionnaires and contract clauses from your largest customers and decide which frameworks the quote covers.
There is no self-serve trial, so bring your framework list and headcount to the demo and ask for an itemised annual quote.
Link cloud, HR, identity and password tools such as AWS, Workday, JumpCloud and 1Password, then review the generated controls.
Work through failing controls, publish policies in the policy module, and track Indian duties like CERT-In reporting elsewhere.
Engage an independent audit firm, give it the mapped evidence, and decide afterwards whether a Trust Center licence is worth adding.
Modelled on Gartner Peer Insights structure. *Counts and breakdowns are illustrative pending verified review collection.
“Every Mac we own already ran Iru, so the SOC 2 module was one more line on the renewal, not one more vendor review.”
“The AI-drafted controls were a fair first cut, but our auditor still had us reword about a third into plainer language.”
“Workday and 1Password evidence now arrives on its own. Exporting those reports used to cost our HR team two days.”
“We sell to US hospitals, so HIPAA beside ISO 27001 in one workspace beat the tools that centred only on SOC 2.”
“There is no DPDP or CERT-In mapping, so our Indian regulatory tracker still sits in a spreadsheet beside it.”
“Demo-only buying slowed us down. We wanted to click through a trial workspace before giving sales an hour.”
Analyst firms bury this view behind paywalls, and G2 retired its Grid. So here’s TechBag’s synthesis of the compliance automation market — tap any vendor to see why it sits where it does.
Execution strength vs product vision — the classic market map, minus the paywall.
A year old; quoted per framework plus seats.
The grid nobody publishes — how ready a tool is for Indian rules and Indian hosting vs how many frameworks and connectors it brings.
11 frameworks, none Indian; US or EU tenants.
Positions are TechBag’s illustrative synthesis of public review-platform data and vendor documentation — not a reproduction of any analyst graphic. Verify before relying on it.
Against Vanta, Drata, Secureframe, Sprinto and OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance — on frameworks, Indian rules, price, evidence, auditors and hosting.
| Dimension | Iru Compliance Automation | Vanta | Drata | Secureframe | Sprinto | OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| What it is | Audit prep, device suite | Compliance-first GRC | Trust management GRC | GRC with a CMMC tier | Bengaluru-built GRC | GRC beside privacy |
| Frameworks listed | 11 frameworks | SOC 2 to HITRUST | 30+ pre-built | 38 on its list | 25+ automated | Mapped control library |
| Indian rules | None listed | None named | None named | None named | DPDP Act page | DPDPA content |
| Pricing model | Per framework + seats | Four tiers, quoted | Quote by package | Tiers; frameworks extra | Plans + modules | Quote-only modules |
| Published entry price | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published |
| Included vs add-on | Trust Center apart | Trust Center in tier 1 | SafeBase-based trust | SSO/SCIM in Complete | Enterprise modules | Auditor fee on top |
| Integrations | Named, no count | 400+ tools | Count not stated | 300+ native | No count in plan docs | Shared inventory |
| Device evidence | Same platform as MDM | Own monitor or MDM | Read-only Drata Agent | Free read-only agent | Dr. Sprinto app | Not documented |
| AI governance frameworks | ISO 42001 listed | ISO 42001 + NIST AI RMF | Three AI frameworks | AI group of three | Not in plan docs | Separate AI product |
| Auditor relationship | No network named | Auditor directory | Not found | Not on plan page | Not in plan docs | Not an auditor |
| Hosting regions | US or EU only | US, EU, Australia | Not published | Not published | Not published | Ask in the quote |
| Platform beyond GRC | Endpoint, EDR, identity | Risk and trust | Trust management | CUI enclave in Defense | TPRM and ERM | Privacy suite |
| Best fit | Iru device shops | Broad global programmes | Wide framework lists | US defence suppliers | Indian SaaS exporters | Privacy-led GRC |
Honest fit signals — because the fastest way to lose your trust is to pretend one product wins every scenario.
TechBag has no compliance automation guide yet, so Iru Compliance Automation sits outside the category guides. Browse all products to compare it with the rest of the catalogue. →
Drag the sliders (employees in audit scope; staff-hour cost). Estimates model the time spent chasing screenshots, access reviews and policy sign-offs at an assumed 1.5 hours per in-scope employee a year, with 70% of it removed by automated evidence collection. Both figures are assumptions. Illustrative.
Loaded cost = salary + overheads per productive hour. Illustrative only — your TechBag quote models your actual environment and modules.
Not published: Iru licenses Compliance Automation per framework (SOC 2, ISO 27001 and others) plus seats, on an annual contract billed annually, and quotes it only after a demo. Trust Center is a separate line. TechBag fixes the framework list first, then gets the quote itemised in INR with GST.
Best for a first SOC 2 or ISO 27001
Best for a broader rollout
Best once customers ask to see proof
Whatever the list prices above, TechBag negotiates a significantly better deal — with GST-compliant INR invoicing and local support. Ask us for your discounted quote.
Tell us your requirements and current tools — we’ll model it against what you spend today.
Take this into your next vendor call — including ours.
Which of the 11 listed frameworks do customers actually demand, and is each priced as its own line in the quote?
Where will CERT-In, DPDP Act, RBI or SEBI work live, given that none of them appears in Iru’s framework list?
Is US or EU hosting for audit evidence acceptable to your board, your customers and any sector regulator you answer to?
How many seats does the quote assume, and who needs one — IT, security, HR, leadership or the external auditor?
Do your systems — AWS, Workday, JumpCloud, Snowflake and the rest — appear among Iru’s documented connectors?
Who will audit you? Iru is not an audit firm and names no network, so line the firm up before the evidence is ready.
Do you need a public Trust Center now? It is billed separately, so decide whether it belongs in the first quote.
Are the annual term, the renewal terms and an INR quote with GST written down before anyone signs?
List the frameworks your customers demand first, or let a TechBag advisor book the Iru demo and test it against one real audit scope.
Stats, ratings, review counts and pricing are illustrative and sourced from public materials; verify before purchase.