Your scanner lists thousands of findings. It can’t tell you which ones let an attacker in — vPenTest runs automated internal and external network penetration tests that exploit, escalate and pivot like an attacker, then reports what actually got through — monthly if you want, without booking a consultancy.
Buy through TechBag
Same software. Better outcome — at a lower cost.
How it’s rated
Full scoreboard ↓Quick answer
This page covers vPenTest — Vonahi’s automated network pentesting, with Kaseya’s VulScan scanner folded in. The rest:
Most product pages skip this. We start here — so you buy a capability, not a buzzword.
Software that attacks your network on a schedule the way a human tester would, then reports what it actually reached.
What consolidation actually replaces, dimension by dimension.
| Dimension | A yearly consultant pentest | vPenTest |
|---|---|---|
| How often you test | Once a year, when the consultant has a slot | Monthly or on demand, from 30 minutes ahead |
| What a finding means | A scanner’s guess that a service is weak | Proof the weakness was exploited, or not |
| Seeing the attack | A PDF weeks after the testers leave | A live Activity Log while the test runs |
| Turning results into work | Someone retypes findings into tickets | Findings opened as Autotask tickets |
| Checking the fixes | Wait for next year’s engagement | Run the same scope again next month |
| What it is NOT | — | A scanner, a web-app test, or a CERT-In report |
The cheapest test is one internal assessment on a single subnet: deploy the agent, run it out of hours and compare the report with your last pentest.
Vendors love diagrams; buyers need to know what they’re actually operating. Here’s the whole platform, demystified.
A multi-tenant web app where each client is an organization: you set scope, IP ranges and test windows, follow progress and download the finished reports.
A Linux VM or small box on your network, cloud-hosted if needed, that installs fresh tools before each run and attacks from inside through a Kali container.
OSINT and host discovery, then safe exploits, password attacks and short MitM bursts, then privilege escalation and lateral movement, as a human tester would.
A live log of every agent action for SIEM correlation, then technical and executive reports, which Vonahi says arrive within 48 hours of the test ending.
A SaaS portal and one Linux agent inside your network — attacks run from within, results land in the portal.
vPenTest attacks your network the way an intruder would, then reports which weaknesses actually let it in.
External tests first gather domains, DNS records and usernames from public sources, then turn them into login attempts.
Long-tested exploits are tried against what discovery turns up; attacks known to cause a denial of service are left out.
With a foothold it cracks password hashes, escalates privileges and moves laterally, showing how far one breach can spread.
Every agent action is logged in real time, so you can check afterwards whether your SIEM and EDR noticed any of it.
Vonahi says reports arrive within 48 hours of a test; since 2025 an AI summary and slides put the top risks in business terms.
Organisations in EMEA or Australasia can pick a CREST-certified network test when scheduling; India is outside that scope.
The VulScan integration copies its internal and external findings and fix steps into a scheduled vPenTest assessment.
Since April 2026 findings can open and update Autotask tickets, so fixing starts in the PSA rather than in a PDF.
Credentials Dark Web ID has found can be tried during a test, to show whether a leaked password or missing 2FA lets someone in.
Here’s what genuinely sets it apart — and exactly where it stops.
A scanner reports that a service might be vulnerable. vPenTest tries the exploit, cracks the hashes it captures, escalates privileges and moves sideways, then shows which findings chained into real access. Severity starts from CVSS, and Vonahi lowers a finding that led nowhere.
A test can be scheduled to start 30 minutes ahead, inside the hours you allow, and repeated monthly as the network changes. Reports trend findings from one run to the next. Vonahi pitches it at over 60% below a manual pentest’s cost; that is its claim, so compare quotes.
A vulnerability programme finds weaknesses, ranks them, fixes them and checks the fixes. vPenTest serves the ranking and checking: it proves which scanner findings an attacker could actually use. TechBag has no automated-pentest guide, and this guide already covers pentesting.
It tests networks; web-application testing is not in its documentation. Exploits cannot be switched off per host, so fragile systems must leave the scope. There is no published price, no India hosting region and no CERT-In empanelment, and it does not replace continuous scanning.
List internal and external IP ranges, get written approval from every owner, and pull fragile systems out of scope.
Build the Ubuntu agent on a bridged VM or small box, open outbound 443 and allowlist Vonahi’s source IPs for external runs.
Schedule it out of hours, watch the Activity Log beside your SIEM, and note what your EDR did and did not alert on.
Turn findings into tickets, fix the paths that reached valuable data, then rerun the same scope to prove they closed.
Add the external test, link VulScan or Autotask if you use them, and agree a monthly cadence with owners of each range.
Modelled on Gartner Peer Insights structure. *Counts and breakdowns are illustrative pending verified review collection.
“The first internal run cracked a service account hash and reached a file server our scanner had rated medium.”
“We moved from one consultant test a year to monthly runs. The trend page shows the board fewer findings each quarter.”
“Read the Activity Log beside your SIEM. Ours missed the lateral movement entirely, which mattered more than the report.”
“Exploits cannot be turned off per host, so we left two legacy controllers out of scope and ran an assessment on them.”
“Agent setup took an afternoon on a spare Hyper-V host. Bridged networking was the step we nearly got wrong.”
“Good network testing, but our auditor still asked for a CERT-In empanelled firm, so we pay for that report too.”
Analyst firms bury this view behind paywalls, and G2 retired its Grid. So here’s TechBag’s synthesis of the vulnerability management market — tap any vendor to see why it sits where it does.
Execution strength vs product vision — the classic market map, minus the paywall.
Quote only; licences counted by internal and external IPs.
The grid nobody publishes — how far a product goes towards proving a weakness is exploitable vs how often it can test without hiring people.
Exploits, escalates and pivots; runs monthly or on demand.
Positions are TechBag’s illustrative synthesis of public review-platform data and vendor documentation — not a reproduction of any analyst graphic. Verify before relying on it.
Against Mitigata VAPT, Tenable Nessus Professional, Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM and Tenable Vulnerability Management — on testing depth, coverage, price, scale, integrations, India and exit.
| Dimension | vPenTest | Mitigata VAPT | Tenable Nessus Professional | Qualys VMDR | Rapid7 InsightVM | Tenable Vulnerability Management |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| What it is | Automated net pentest | Human-led VAPT service | Stand-alone scanner | Scan, rank and patch | Risk-based VM, hybrid | Cloud VM lifecycle |
| Deployment | SaaS + one Linux agent | Delivered by testers | Software you run | Cloud, agent + scanners | Console you host | Cloud, sensors + agents |
| Coverage | Internal + external nets | Web, API, net, cloud | Hosts, basic web checks | Hosts, cloud, endpoints | Hosts; web is extra | Hosts; web, cloud extra |
| Pricing model | Per IP tested, quoted | Per application | Per scanner a year | Per asset, quoted | Per asset a month | Per asset a year |
| Published entry price | Not published | Entry tier per app | $4,790 a year | Reported ~$199–250 | $1.62 per asset/month | $3,700 for 100 assets |
| Included vs add-on | VulScan sold apart | Report and re-test | Scanner only | Patching bundled | Workflow in the cloud | No patching |
| Scale and limits | 45 s–4 min per host | Bound by tester time | One scanner by design | Cloud-scale | Heavy console sizing | Above 10,000 assets |
| Testing depth | Exploits and pivots | Manual exploitation | Detects, no exploit | Detects, TruRisk-ranked | Exploit-weighted ranking | Detects, VPR-ranked |
| Integrations | Autotask, DWID, API | Feeds its own services | Reports and exports | One platform, many apps | Agent shared with SIEM | Path to Tenable One |
| Governance and tenants | Multi-tenant, KaseyaOne | A service, not a tenant | No central console | One shared tenant | Your console, assigned | Cloud tenant |
| India data and CERT-In | US, Germany, Australia | Indian, CERT-In sold | Stays on your host | India platform | Console can sit in India | Not documented |
| Support | Tickets, 1 business day | From the test team | 24/7 costs extra | Often via partners | Ask for targets | Ask for targets |
| Lock-in and exit | Reports purge on a timer | The report is yours | Files stay local | History in the tenant | Old scores not kept | Trends in the cloud |
| Best fit | Monthly network pentests | Regulator-facing VAPT | Consultants, small teams | Find and fix in one | Hybrid, deadline-driven | Published-price cloud VM |
Honest fit signals — because the fastest way to lose your trust is to pretend one product wins every scenario.
vPenTest is one of 20 vulnerability management products TechBag carries. The Vulnerability Management guide narrows them to a shortlist and shows the reasoning. →
Drag the sliders (IP addresses in scope; security staff-hour cost). Estimates model the staff and consultant time spent scoping, running, chasing and re-testing manual network pentests at an assumed 1.5 hours per IP a year, with 70% of it removed by automated, scheduled testing. Both figures are assumptions. Illustrative.
Loaded cost = salary + overheads per productive hour. Illustrative only — your TechBag quote models your actual environment and modules.
Quote only. Kaseya and Vonahi publish no vPenTest price. Kaseya’s terms count licences by type — internal IPs and external IPs among them — over a committed service term, so the quote turns on how many addresses you test. Vonahi markets it as over 60% cheaper than a manual network pentest; that is its claim, not a quote. VulScan is licensed separately. TechBag counts your in-scope IPs first, then gets the quote with GST.
Best for what an insider or infected laptop could reach
Best for a broader rollout
Best for testing your internet-facing perimeter
Whatever the list prices above, TechBag negotiates a significantly better deal — with GST-compliant INR invoicing and local support. Ask us for your discounted quote.
Tell us your requirements and current tools — we’ll model it against what you spend today.
Take this into your next vendor call — including ours.
Do you need proof of exploitable paths, or simply a list of weaknesses? The second is a scanner’s job.
How many internal and external IPs are in scope? Every networked device, printers and cameras included, counts.
Have the owners of every range, including clients and cloud tenants, approved testing in writing?
Which hosts must not be exploited? They have to leave the pentest scope, as exploits cannot be disabled per host.
Can you host an Ubuntu 24.04 agent with 2 cores, 8 GB RAM, 80 GB disk, bridged networking and outbound 443?
Does your regulator or auditor accept this report, or require a CERT-In-empanelled firm’s VAPT as well?
Is hosting results in the US, Germany or Australia acceptable under your DPDP and contractual obligations?
Does the quote state internal and external IP counts, the term, test frequency and whether VulScan is included?
Count the internal and external IPs you need tested first, or let a TechBag advisor scope a first internal pentest and walk your team through what it reached.
Stats, ratings, review counts and pricing are illustrative and sourced from public materials; verify before purchase.