Qualys WAS is the app-security & attack-surface page — know your external footprint (CSAM/EASM), then DAST-scan the web apps & APIs on it (WAS): OWASP Top 10, injection, XSS, misconfigs, APIs. All on the same asset inventory and one TruRisk score — not a standalone point tool.
Buy through TechBag
Same software. Better outcome — at a lower cost.
How it’s rated
Full scoreboard ↓Quick answer
This page covers Qualys WAS + CSAM/EASM — app-security & attack surface. The rest of the Qualys platform:
Most product pages skip this. We start here — so you buy a capability, not a buzzword.
Qualys’s app-security & attack-surface page — know your external footprint (CSAM/EASM), then DAST-scan the web apps & APIs on it (WAS), all on one asset inventory and one TruRisk score.
What consolidation actually replaces, dimension by dimension.
| Dimension | Scan-only app-sec | Web App Scanning |
|---|---|---|
| Scope of apps | Only the apps you know about | EASM finds shadow IT & orphaned apps too |
| Surface + scan | ASM and DAST in separate tools | Surface then scan, one flow |
| Cadence | Annual point-in-time pentest | Continuous, cloud-scale DAST |
| APIs | UI-only scanner misses them | REST/SOAP/GraphQL API scanning |
| Inventory | App silo, separate from host VM | Same asset inventory as VMDR |
| Prioritisation | App-only severity ratings | One TruRisk score, app + host |
| Compliance | Scramble for PCI evidence | Audit-ready PCI/OWASP reports |
| Best fit | (varies) | App-sec + attack surface, one platform |
Qualys WAS is app-sec & attack surface — know your external footprint (CSAM/EASM), then DAST-scan the web apps & APIs on it (WAS: OWASP Top 10, injection, XSS, misconfigs), on the same asset inventory & one TruRisk score. Honest: dedicated DAST specialists (Invicti/Checkmarx/AppScan, Burp for manual pentest) go deeper on pure web-app testing; EASM leans on VMDR/WAS for testing. TechBag scopes modules/counts, adds GST & the India PCI/RBI framing.
Vendors love diagrams; buyers need to know what they’re actually operating. Here’s the whole platform, demystified.
CSAM keeps a full asset inventory, and EASM finds unknown internet-facing assets — shadow IT, forgotten domains, orphaned apps and APIs.
WAS discovers and maps the web apps and APIs on that footprint, including REST/SOAP/GraphQL and Swagger/Postman-defined APIs.
DAST scans running apps and APIs for OWASP Top 10 issues like injection and XSS, authenticated and continuously, at cloud scale.
App and API findings join the same inventory and TruRisk score as host, cloud and OT vulnerabilities on the same asset.
WAS and CSAM/EASM are apps on the Enterprise TruRisk Platform, sharing inventory and data with VMDR and compliance.
One inventory of web apps and APIs from CSAM and EASM — scanned continuously by DAST and scored with the rest of the estate.
Qualys WAS discovers your external attack surface (CSAM/EASM) & DAST-scans the web apps and APIs on it — on one TruRisk score — the app-security & attack-surface app of the Qualys portfolio.
CSAM keeps a complete inventory with software, ports, certificates and EoL/EoS context — the base for app-sec.
Finds unknown internet-facing assets — shadow IT, forgotten domains, orphaned apps and APIs — attackers can see.
Discovers and maps the web apps and APIs on your footprint, so every endpoint is a known, tracked asset.
Dynamically scans running apps for OWASP Top 10 issues — injection, XSS, misconfigs, exposed data — as an attacker would.
Scans REST, SOAP, GraphQL and Swagger/OpenAPI or Postman-defined APIs, not just the web UI.
Authenticated and deep scans test the app behind the login, where the sensitive functions and data live.
Detects malware on web apps and flags exposed PII or cardholder data, beyond code flaws.
Scans continuously across hundreds or thousands of apps, catching issues as apps change rather than yearly.
App and API findings use the same TruRisk score as host, cloud and OT vulnerabilities on the same asset.
App findings sit on the same inventory as VMDR host findings, showing an asset’s whole exposure in one place.
Audit-ready reports for PCI-DSS (which explicitly requires web-app scanning), OWASP and ISO.
Routes findings to owners via ServiceNow, Jira and no-code workflows, so flaws get fixed and closed.
The overview, getting started, and the core workflows.
The TruRisk Platform end to end — the same inventory WAS shares.
One TruRisk score — app + host, together.
One platform, one risk language across the estate.
Want a live, India-context walkthrough for your environment?
Book a guided demo →Here’s what genuinely sets Qualys WAS apart (and where a specialist leads).
Breached apps are usually ones nobody remembered: shadow IT, forgotten microsites, orphaned staging sites, undocumented APIs. A standalone DAST tool only scans what you list. Qualys’s CSAM/EASM finds your internet-facing footprint, then WAS discovers and scans the web apps and APIs on it, continuously.
In most firms, web-app scanning sits in a separate DAST tool with its own app list and severity scale, apart from host vulnerability management. Qualys WAS findings join the same inventory and TruRisk score as VMDR, so an XSS sits next to the unpatched CVEs on its host and is prioritised with them.
An annual pentest is a snapshot that covers a handful of apps and misses every change since. WAS runs automated DAST continuously across your whole portfolio — OWASP Top 10, injection, XSS — with authenticated scans and dedicated API scanning (OpenAPI, Postman, GraphQL). Burp still has its place for manual pentesting.
Qualys pioneered cloud vulnerability scanning in 1999, is listed on NASDAQ (QLYS) and serves >10,000 customers. WAS inherits that maturity: accurate detections and the scale to scan hundreds or thousands of apps with no infrastructure to run — often on a platform you already use for VMDR.
PCI-DSS explicitly requires regular web-application scanning, and WAS produces that evidence with OWASP and ISO 27001 mapping and audit-ready reports — relevant to Indian payments, BFSI and government. Qualys quotes per app or asset in USD; TechBag scopes modules, sizes counts and invoices in INR/GST.
For the deepest pure DAST, Invicti, Checkmarx, AppScan and Rapid7 InsightAppSec lead; Burp is the standard for manual pentesting; and Axonius, CyCognito, Censys and Defender EASM specialise in discovery. Qualys’s edge is joining EASM and WAS on one inventory and one TruRisk score.
WAS, CSAM/EASM, how they sit with VMDR, and app/asset counts. TechBag sizes it against PCI, RBI and CERT-In.
Turn on CSAM/EASM to inventory assets and find unknown internet-facing apps, domains and APIs.
DAST-scan the web apps and APIs on that footprint, authenticated and continuously — no more annual pentest.
Put findings in one TruRisk score with host risk, route fixes via ITSM, and produce PCI/OWASP reports.
Modelled on Gartner Peer Insights structure. *Counts and breakdowns are illustrative pending verified review collection.
“EASM found internet-facing apps we’d forgotten we owned, and WAS scanned them, all in the same inventory.”
“An XSS on an app now sits next to the unpatched CVEs on its host. We see a server’s whole exposure in one place.”
“We moved from an annual pentest to continuous WAS across hundreds of apps and APIs, catching issues as we deploy.”
“For our PCI scope, WAS produced exactly the web-app scanning evidence our QSA wanted. TechBag framed the deployment around PCI and handled GST.”
“We keep Burp for manual pentests and rate Invicti highly, but for continuous scanning on one risk score, Qualys wins.”
“API scanning mattered most — REST, GraphQL, Swagger-defined endpoints. A UI-only scanner would have missed it.”
“Rapid7, Checkmarx and AppScan were close, but WAS uses the same inventory and TruRisk score as our VMDR.”
“Qualys quotes per app/asset in USD. TechBag scoped the counts, invoiced in INR/GST and gave us the PCI framing.”
Analyst firms bury this view behind paywalls, and review-site grids score satisfaction, not fit for your estate. So here’s TechBag’s synthesis of the App-security & attack-surface market — tap any vendor to see why it sits where it does.
Execution strength vs product vision — the classic market map, minus the paywall.
WAS + attack surface, one platform. This page.
The grid nobody publishes — DAST depth vs app-sec + attack-surface breadth.
Scan + surface + one TruRisk score.
Positions are TechBag’s illustrative synthesis of public review-platform data and vendor documentation — not a reproduction of any analyst graphic. Verify before relying on it.
Invicti, Rapid7 InsightAppSec, Checkmarx DAST, Burp (PortSwigger) and HCL AppScan — honest lanes; the DAST specialists go deeper on pure web-app testing, the edge here is WAS joined with attack surface + the same inventory + one TruRisk score on one platform. Deepest pure DAST? Invicti/Checkmarx/AppScan. Manual pentest? Burp. Dedicated EASM? Axonius/CyCognito/Censys/Defender EASM. We say so.
| Dimension | Qualys WAS | Invicti | Rapid7 InsightAppSec | Checkmarx DAST | Burp (PortSwigger) | HCL AppScan |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Position | WAS + attack surface, one platform | DAST specialist (proof-based) | DAST in the Insight platform | DAST alongside SAST leadership | Manual pentest standard | Mature DAST + SAST suite |
| Pure DAST depth | Solid, cloud-scale DAST | Deep (proof-based scanning) | Strong (InsightAppSec) | Strong DAST | Deepest (manual/assisted) | Strong, mature |
| Attack surface (EASM) | Yes — CSAM/EASM built in | Some surface discovery | Via broader platform | Not the focus | Not an ASM tool | Not the focus |
| API scanning | REST/SOAP/GraphQL, Swagger | Strong API scanning | API scanning | API support | Excellent (manual) | API support |
| One platform + TruRisk (app+host) | Same inventory + one TruRisk score | Standalone app-sec | Insight platform (app-sec side) | Checkmarx One (app-sec only) | Standalone tool | AppScan 360 (app-sec only) |
| Continuous & cloud-scale | Continuous, cloud-scale | Continuous, scalable | Continuous (SaaS) | Scalable | Manual, per-tester | Scalable |
| Compliance (PCI/OWASP) | Deep (PCI web-app scan, OWASP) | Strong (OWASP/PCI) | Solid | Strong | Manual evidence | Strong |
| Best fit | WAS + attack surface + one TruRisk, one platform | Deepest pure DAST (proof-based) | DAST in a SecOps platform | DAST + SAST app-sec suite | Manual penetration testing | Mature DAST + SAST suite |
Honest fit signals — because the fastest way to lose your trust is to pretend one product wins every scenario.
Qualys Web App Scanning is one of 23 vulnerability management products TechBag carries. The Vulnerability Management guide narrows them to a shortlist and shows the reasoning. →
Drag the sliders (web apps & APIs; security-hour cost as loaded rate). Estimates contrast scan-only app-sec sprawl (a separate DAST tool, no attack-surface discovery so shadow IT goes untested, an app-only silo, annual pentest cadence) vs Qualys WAS (surface-then-scan, continuous cloud-scale DAST incl. APIs, one asset inventory and one TruRisk score) — the wins are fewer untested internet-facing apps, faster prioritisation, and one risk view. Illustrative — TechBag scopes your estate.
Loaded cost = salary + overheads per productive hour. Illustrative only — your TechBag quote models your actual environment and modules.
Qualys WAS prices PER WEB APP (a pool of app licences), and CSAM/EASM PER ASSET — annual subscription, modular — quote-only (no public list; sold via channel, in USD). Rates compress sharply with volume and 2–3-year commitments, and WAS is often bundled with VMDR on the same platform. TechBag scopes the app and asset counts, adds INR/GST, and frames it against your compliance mandates (PCI especially) — quote current figures for your estate.
Best for app-sec + attack surface at scale
Best for a broader rollout
Best value with TechBag
Whatever the list prices above, TechBag negotiates a significantly better deal — with GST-compliant INR invoicing and local support. Ask us for your discounted quote.
Tell us your requirements and current tools — we’ll model it against what you spend today.
Take this into your next vendor call — including ours.
Do you know every internet-facing app you own? CSAM/EASM finds shadow IT and orphaned apps; WAS scans them.
Are you only scanning the apps you already know about? Qualys joins attack-surface discovery with DAST scanning in one flow.
Are your APIs tested? WAS scans REST/SOAP/GraphQL and Swagger/Postman-defined APIs — not just the web UI.
Still doing an annual pentest? WAS runs continuous, cloud-scale DAST across your whole portfolio as apps change.
Is app-sec a silo? WAS shares the SAME asset inventory and ONE TruRisk score as your host/infrastructure risk.
PCI in scope? PCI-DSS explicitly requires web-app scanning — WAS produces the audit-ready evidence (plus OWASP/ISO).
Weighing Invicti, Rapid7, Checkmarx, Burp or AppScan? They go deeper on pure DAST; Qualys’s edge is integration.
Qualys prices per app/asset by quote in USD — TechBag scopes modules/counts, adds INR/GST and the PCI/RBI/CERT-In framing.
Scope Qualys WAS (web-app & API scanning joined with CSAM/EASM attack surface, on the same asset inventory and one TruRisk score) — and let a TechBag advisor scope the modules and app/asset counts, compare vs Invicti/Checkmarx/Burp honestly, frame it against your compliance mandates (PCI especially, plus RBI/CERT-In), and add INR/GST invoicing and local support.
Stats, ratings, review counts and pricing are illustrative and sourced from public materials; verify before purchase.